Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22071233›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011

Malabsorption and nutritional balance in the ICU: fecal weight as a biomarker: a prospective observational pilot study.

Nicolette J Wierdsma, Job H C Peters, Peter J M Weijs, Martjin B Keur, Armand R J Girbes, Ad A van Bodegraven, Albertus Beishuizen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of the route of nutrition and L-alanyl-L-glutamine supplementation in amino acids' concentration in trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. When is parenteral nutrition indicated?Journal of intensive medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Acute Intestinal Failure.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enteral tolerance in critically ill patients.Journal of intensive care · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolette J WierdsmaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. N.Wierdsma@vumc.nl
Job H C Peters
Peter J M Weijs
Martjin B Keur
Armand R J Girbes
Ad A van Bodegraven
Albertus Beishuizen
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRode Kruis Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMalabsorption, which is frequently underdiagnosed in critically ill patients, is clinically relevant with regard to nutritional balance and nutritional management. We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of fecal weight as a biomarker for fecal loss and additionally to assess fecal macronutrient contents and intestinal absorption capacity in ICU patients.

methodsThis was an observational pilot study in a tertiary mixed medical-surgical ICU in hemodynamically stable adult ICU patients, without clinically evident gastrointestinal malfunction. Fecal weight (grams/day), fecal energy (by bomb calorimetry in kcal/day), and macronutrient content (fat, protein, and carbohydrate in grams/day) were measured. Diagnostic accuracy expressed in terms of test sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operator curves (ROCs) were calculated for fecal weight as a marker for energy malabsorption. Malabsorption was a priori defined as < 85% intestinal absorption capacity.

resultsForty-eight patients (63 ± 15 years; 58% men) receiving full enteral feeding were included. A cut-off fecal production of > 350 g/day (that is, diarrhea) was linked to the optimal ROC (0.879), showing a sensitivity and PPV of 80%, respectively. Specificity and NPV were both 96%. Fecal weight (grams/day) and intestinal energy-absorption capacity were inversely correlated (r = -0.69; P < 0.001). Patients with > 350 g feces/day had a significantly more-negative energy balance compared with patients with < 350 g feces/day (loss of 627 kcal/day versus neutral balance; P = 0.012).

conclusionsA fecal weight > 350 g/day in ICU patients is a biomarker applicable in daily practice, which can act as a surrogate for fecal energy loss and intestinal energy absorption. Daily measurement of fecal weight is a feasible means of monitoring the nutritional status of critically ill patients and, in those identified as having malabsorption, can monitor responses to changes in dietary management.

Indexed as

FecesNutritional StatusBiomarkersCalorimetryChi-Square DistributionEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalabsorption SyndromesMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22071233
PMCPMC3388706
OpenAlexW2111647679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.