Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22071129›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2011

Amyloid imaging in the differential diagnosis of dementia: review and potential clinical applications.

Robert Laforce, Gil D Rabinovici

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. The AHA/ASA and DSM-V diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive impairment identify cases with predominant vascular pathology.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Morphological classification and changes in dementia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Initial Physician Experience with [Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert LaforceMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Avenue, Suite 905, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. rlaforce@memory.ucsf.edu.
Gil D Rabinovici
University Memory and Aging Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Amyloid PET in AD, FTLD & PPA: Diagnosis, Functional & Structural CorrelationsK23AG031861 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RABINOVICI, GIL DAN · 2008 to 2012
$793k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG031861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, positron emission tomography (PET) with carbon-11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB) has revolutionized the neuroimaging of aging and dementia by enabling in vivo detection of amyloid plaques, a core pathologic feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies suggest that PIB-PET is sensitive for AD pathology, can distinguish AD from non-AD dementia (for example, frontotemporal lobar degeneration), and can help determine whether mild cognitive impairment is due to AD. Although the short half-life of the carbon-11 radiolabel has thus far limited the use of PIB to research, a second generation of tracers labeled with fluorine-18 has made it possible for amyloid PET to enter the clinical era. In the present review, we summarize the literature on amyloid imaging in a range of neurodegenerative conditions. We focus on potential clinical applications of amyloid PET and its role in the differential diagnosis of dementia. We suggest that amyloid imaging will be particularly useful in the evaluation of mildly affected, clinically atypical or early age-at-onset patients, and illustrate this with case vignettes from our practice. We emphasize that amyloid imaging should supplement (not replace) a detailed clinical evaluation. We caution against screening asymptomatic individuals, and discuss the limited positive predictive value in older populations. Finally, we review limitations and unresolved questions related to this exciting new technique.

Identifiers

PMID22071129
PMCPMC3308020
OpenAlexW2166939267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.