Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22071104›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2011

Eph/ephrin interactions modulate muscle satellite cell motility and patterning.

Danny A Stark, Rowan M Karvas, Ashley L Siegel, D D W Cornelison

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Loss ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. We need to talk-how muscle stem cells communicate.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Normal muscle fiber type distribution is recapitulated in aged ephrin-A3American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danny A StarkDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Rowan M Karvas
Ashley L Siegel
D D W Cornelison
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Motility and Migration of Muscle Satellite CellsR21AR056814 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CORNELISON, DAWN D · 2009 to 2010
$353k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR056814NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR056814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During development and regeneration, directed migration of cells, including neural crest cells, endothelial cells, axonal growth cones and many types of adult stem cells, to specific areas distant from their origin is necessary for their function. We have recently shown that adult skeletal muscle stem cells (satellite cells), once activated by isolation or injury, are a highly motile population with the potential to respond to multiple guidance cues, based on their expression of classical guidance receptors. We show here that, in vivo, differentiated and regenerating myofibers dynamically express a subset of ephrin guidance ligands, as well as Eph receptors. This expression has previously only been examined in the context of muscle-nerve interactions; however, we propose that it might also play a role in satellite cell-mediated muscle repair. Therefore, we investigated whether Eph-ephrin signaling would produce changes in satellite cell directional motility. Using a classical ephrin 'stripe' assay, we found that satellite cells respond to a subset of ephrins with repulsive behavior in vitro; patterning of differentiating myotubes is also parallel to ephrin stripes. This behavior can be replicated in a heterologous in vivo system, the hindbrain of the developing quail, in which neural crest cells are directed in streams to the branchial arches and to the forelimb of the developing quail, where presumptive limb myoblasts emigrate from the somite. We hypothesize that guidance signaling might impact multiple steps in muscle regeneration, including escape from the niche, directed migration to sites of injury, cell-cell interactions among satellite cell progeny, and differentiation and patterning of regenerated muscle.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningBranchial RegionCell MovementCells, CulturedEphrinsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred CBAMuscle DevelopmentNeural CrestQuailReceptors, Eph FamilyRhombencephalonSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleEphrinsReceptors, Eph Family

Identifiers

PMID22071104
PMCPMC3222207
OpenAlexW2118209558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.