ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2012
Modeling the dementia epidemic.
Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimation of events in cohort studies based on probability of cognitive impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- The rehabilitation engineering research center for the advancement of cognitive technologies.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2015Article
- A commentary on studies presenting projections of the future prevalence of dementia.BMC public health · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of dementia increases steeply with age in older people, although from the tenth decade the slope may be smoother, perhaps reflecting different pathological processes in the oldest old. The prevalence depends upon interaction of age with other factors (e.g., comorbidities, genetic or environmental factors) that in turn are subject to change. If onset of dementia could be postponed by modulating its risk factors, this could significantly affect its incidence. Analysis of risk and protection factors should take into account the critical period during which these factors play a role. For example, the impact of education and diabetes mellitus occurs in early- and midlife, respectively, while maintaining optimal physical and mental activity and controlling vascular factors later in life may slow the rate of cognitive decline. Modifying factors need to be evaluated for different clinical groups, taking into account genetic background, age, and duration at exposure. The aim of the present article is to try to take stock of epidemiological data concerning factors affecting the prevalence of dementia and predict future developments, as well as to look for possible interventions that could affect outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.