Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22069711›Full record

ReviewToxins2011

Brown spider (Loxosceles genus) venom toxins: tools for biological purposes.

Olga Meiri Chaim, Dilza Trevisan-Silva, Daniele Chaves-Moreira, Ana Carolina M Wille, Valéria Pereira Ferrer, Fernando Hitomi Matsubara, Oldemir Carlos Mangili, Rafael Bertoni da Silveira, Luiza Helena Gremski, Waldemiro Gremski and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. An overview of some enzymes from buthid scorpion venoms from Colombia:The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brown spider (Loxosceles sp.) bite and COVID-19: A case report.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of the effects ofToxicology reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spider bites of medical significance in the Mediterranean area: misdiagnosis, clinical features and management.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Brown Spider (Toxins · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga Meiri ChaimDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, CEP 81531-980 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. olgachaim@ufpr.br
Dilza Trevisan-Silva
Daniele Chaves-Moreira
Ana Carolina M Wille
Valéria Pereira Ferrer
Fernando Hitomi Matsubara
Oldemir Carlos Mangili
Rafael Bertoni da Silveira
Luiza Helena Gremski
Waldemiro Gremski
Andrea Senff-Ribeiro
Silvio Sanches Veiga
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venomous animals use their venoms as tools for defense or predation. These venoms are complex mixtures, mainly enriched of proteic toxins or peptides with several, and different, biological activities. In general, spider venom is rich in biologically active molecules that are useful in experimental protocols for pharmacology, biochemistry, cell biology and immunology, as well as putative tools for biotechnology and industries. Spider venoms have recently garnered much attention from several research groups worldwide. Brown spider (Loxosceles genus) venom is enriched in low molecular mass proteins (5-40 kDa). Although their venom is produced in minute volumes (a few microliters), and contain only tens of micrograms of protein, the use of techniques based on molecular biology and proteomic analysis has afforded rational projects in the area and permitted the discovery and identification of a great number of novel toxins. The brown spider phospholipase-D family is undoubtedly the most investigated and characterized, although other important toxins, such as low molecular mass insecticidal peptides, metalloproteases and hyaluronidases have also been identified and featured in literature. The molecular pathways of the action of these toxins have been reported and brought new insights in the field of biotechnology. Herein, we shall see how recent reports describing discoveries in the area of brown spider venom have expanded biotechnological uses of molecules identified in these venoms, with special emphasis on the construction of a cDNA library for venom glands, transcriptome analysis, proteomic projects, recombinant expression of different proteic toxins, and finally structural descriptions based on crystallography of toxins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBiotechnologyBrown Recluse SpiderHyaluronoglucosaminidaseMetalloproteasesPhospholipase DSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSpider VenomsToxins, BiologicalTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1Biomarkers, TumorHyaluronoglucosaminidaseMetalloproteasesPhospholipase DSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSpider VenomsToxins, BiologicalTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1biotechnological applicationsbrown spiderLoxoscelesrecombinant toxinsvenom

Identifiers

PMID22069711
PMCPMC3202818
OpenAlexW1979753649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.