Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22069597›Full record

ReviewToxins2010

Venom proteins of the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis: recent discovery of an untapped pharmacopee.

Ellen L Danneels, David B Rivers, Dirk C de Graaf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and Competition of Three Parasitoid Wasps,Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A chromosome-level genome assembly of the pollinating fig wasp Valisia javana.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  10. Sex-basedGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen L DanneelsLaboratory of Zoophysiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Ellen.Danneels@UGent.be
David B Rivers
Dirk C de Graaf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult females of Nasonia vitripennis inject a venomous mixture into its host flies prior to oviposition. Recently, the entire genome of this ectoparasitoid wasp was sequenced, enabling the identification of 79 venom proteins. The next challenge will be to unravel their specific functions, but based on homolog studies, some predictions already can be made. Parasitization has an enormous impact on hosts physiology of which five major effects are discussed in this review: the impact on immune responses, induction of developmental arrest, increases in lipid levels, apoptosis and nutrient releases. The value of deciphering this venom is also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood CoagulationDipteraFemaleImmune ToleranceImmunity, InnateInsect ProteinsMonophenol MonooxygenaseWaspsWasp VenomsInsect ProteinsMonophenol MonooxygenaseWasp VenomsapoptosiscoagulationdevelopmentimmunitylipidNasonianutrientphenoloxidasevenom

Identifiers

PMID22069597
PMCPMC3153221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.