Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22069533›Full record

ReviewToxins2009

Cyclopiazonic acid biosynthesis of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus oryzae.

Perng-Kuang Chang, Kenneth C Ehrlich, Isao Fujii

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Presence of Some MinorMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Near-GaplessJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. RNA-Seq Based Transcriptome Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. 'Kodo poisoning': cause, science and management.Journal of food science and technology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Distribution ofToxins · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Perng-Kuang ChangSouthern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1100 Robert E. Lee Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA. perngkuang.chang@ars.usda.gov
Kenneth C Ehrlich
Isao Fujii
Agricultural Research Service · USSouthern Regional Research Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) is an indole-tetramic acid neurotoxin produced by some of the same strains of A. flavus that produce aflatoxins and by some Aspergillus oryzae strains. Despite its discovery 40 years ago, few reviews of its toxicity and biosynthesis have been reported. This review examines what is currently known about the toxicity of CPA to animals and humans, both by itself or in combination with other mycotoxins. The review also discusses CPA biosynthesis and the genetic diversity of CPA production in A. flavus/oryzae populations.

Indexed as

Aspergillus flavusAspergillus oryzaeAflatoxinsHumansMycotoxinsAflatoxinsMycotoxinsAspergilluscyclopiazonic acidgene clusternon-ribosomal peptide synthase

Identifiers

PMID22069533
PMCPMC3202784
OpenAlexW2058125499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.