ArticlePloS one2011
Putting into practice domain-linear motif interaction predictions for exploration of protein networks.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity of the mouse Notch ligand DLL1 is sensitive to C-terminal tagging in vivo.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Review
- Integrated analysis of Shank1 PDZ interactions with C-terminal and internal binding motifs.Current research in structural biology · 2021Article
- Article
- MotifAnalyzer-PDZ: A computational program to investigate the evolution of PDZ-binding target specificity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Article
- Transmembrane protein 215 promotes angiogenesis by maintaining endothelial cell survival.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019Article
- Proteome-wide analysis of phospho-regulated PDZ domain interactions.Molecular systems biology · 2018Article
- Structure function relations in PDZ-domain-containing proteins: Implications for protein networks in cellular signalling.Journal of biosciences · 2018Review
- Review
- Article
- Dynamic scaffolds for neuronal signaling: in silico analysis of the TANC protein family.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Gsg1, Trnp1, and Tmem215 Mark Subpopulations of Bipolar Interneurons in the Mouse Retina.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017Article
- modPDZpep: a web resource for structure based analysis of human PDZ-mediated interaction networks.Biology direct · 2016Article
- Fine mapping under linkage peaks for symptomatic or asymptomatic outcomes of Leishmania infantum infection in Brazil.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Quantifying domain-ligand affinities and specificities by high-throughput holdup assay.Nature methods · 2015Article
- MSCA: a spectral comparison algorithm between time series to identify protein-protein interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- MAS C-Terminal Tail Interacting Proteins Identified by Mass Spectrometry- Based Proteomic Approach.PloS one · 2015Article
- Predicting PDZ domain mediated protein interactions from structure.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- The application of modular protein domains in proteomics.FEBS letters · 2012Review
- Plasticity of PDZ domains in ligand recognition and signaling.FEBS letters · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PDZ domains recognise short sequence motifs at the extreme C-termini of proteins. A model based on microarray data has been recently published for predicting the binding preferences of PDZ domains to five residue long C-terminal sequences. Here we investigated the potential of this predictor for discovering novel protein interactions that involve PDZ domains. When tested on real negative data assembled from published literature, the predictor displayed a high false positive rate (FPR). We predicted and experimentally validated interactions between four PDZ domains derived from the human proteins MAGI1 and SCRIB and 19 peptides derived from human and viral C-termini of proteins. Measured binding intensities did not correlate with prediction scores, and the high FPR of the predictor was confirmed. Results indicate that limitations of the predictor may arise from an incomplete model definition and improper training of the model. Taking into account these limitations, we identified several novel putative interactions between PDZ domains of MAGI1 and SCRIB and the C-termini of the proteins FZD4, ARHGAP6, NET1, TANC1, GLUT7, MARCH3, MAS, ABC1, DLL1, TMEM215 and CYSLTR2. These proteins are localised to the membrane or suggested to act close to it and are often involved in G protein signalling. Furthermore, we showed that, while extension of minimal interacting domains or peptides toward tandem constructs or longer peptides never suppressed their ability to interact, the measured affinities and inferred specificity patterns often changed significantly. This suggests that if protein fragments interact, the full length proteins are also likely to interact, albeit possibly with altered affinities and specificities. Therefore, predictors dealing with protein fragments are promising tools for discovering protein interaction networks but their application to predict binding preferences within networks may be limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.