Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22069352›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2011

Evaluation of patients' experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure - what can be improved?

Rajen Tailor, Rebecca Beasley, Yit Yang, Niro Narendran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review: non-adherence and non-persistence in intravitreal treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparison of Two Different Intravitreal Injection Techniques.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk of ptosis following eyelid speculum assisted intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cooling Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections - A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Review
  13. Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  14. Novel Combined Lidocaine/Povidone Iodine Delivery System for Preintravitreal Injection.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Feelings, preoperative anxiety, and need for information in patients undergoing intravitreal injections.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajen TailorWolverhampton and Midland Counties Eye Infirmary, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Rebecca Beasley
Yit Yang
Niro Narendran

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntravitreal injection of ranibizumab has become one of the most commonly performed ophthalmic procedures. It is timely to conduct an evaluation of the injection procedure from the patient's perspective so as to determine ways to improve patient experience. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe patients' experiences of the different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure and provide suggestions for improvement.

methodFollowing intravitreal injection, patients were administered a questionnaire to score the distress felt for each of ten parts of the whole injection process from the initial waiting to the final instillation of topical antibiotic at the end. A score of higher than 4 was regarded as significantly unpleasant. The proportion of scores above 4 for each step was used to evaluate the relative distress experienced by patients for the different parts of the procedure.

resultsA total of 42 patients were surveyed. The step with the highest percentage of patients scoring more than 4 was the injection step (19%). However, cumulatively, the steps relating to the application of the drape, the speculum, and the removal of drape accounted for 53% of scores greater than 4.

conclusionThere is considerable variation in how patients tolerate different stages of the injection procedure. The needle entry was the most unpleasant step followed by the draping steps cumulatively. Use of subconjunctival anesthesia, a perforated drape, and alternative lid exclusion devices may help to improve the patient's tolerability of the procedure and experience.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationpatient experienceranibizumab

Identifiers

PMID22069352
PMCPMC3206121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.