Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22069112›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2012

Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist.

Aude Fourcade, Jean-Louis Blache, Catherine Grenier, Jean-Louis Bourgain, Etienne Minvielle

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700890 (Adaptation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Healthcare Settings - Phase III), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700890 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Adaptation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Healthcare Settings - Phase III: Site Testing Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsSurgical Procedure, Unspecified, Communications Personnel, Tool Use Behavior
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effects of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitations on ATLS adherence, team performance, and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding Sustainability in Operating Theaters: An Ethnographic Study to Determine Drivers of Unsustainable Behaviors.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aude FourcadeQuality Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif cedex, France. aude.fourcade@igr.fr
Jean-Louis Blache
Catherine Grenier
Jean-Louis Bourgain
Etienne Minvielle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.

setting18 cancer centres in France.

designThe authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.

resultsThe study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).

conclusionsSeveral of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.

Indexed as

ChecklistPatient SafetyHumansMedical Staff, HospitalSurgery Department, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID22069112
PMCPMC3285141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.