Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22068505›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2011

Bacteria-based in vivo peptide library screening using biopanning approach.

Ji-Hyeon Choi, Sang-Hyun Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji-Hyeon ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hyun Park

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, library screening has been performed to identify biologically active agents including small molecules or peptides that inhibit target proteins or molecules with therapeutic interests. Due to its chemical nature, library screening is usually performed under in vitro environments using purified proteins and molecules. However, active agents identified from in vitro screenings often fail to exhibit biological activities in cells. To overcome this inherent limitation, we have developed an in vivo peptide library screening system that allows for the identification of dissociative inhibitors of protein interactions of interest. The screening is based on the reconstitution of the cI repressor from bacteriophage lambda with high-density expression peptide library and is entirely performed in bacteria cells. Furthermore, to enhance the efficacy and sensitivity of the screening, a multiple-round biopanning approach was employed for amplification and enrichment of positive peptides. Overall, this in vivo screening should provide a fast and efficient tool for identification of biologically active peptide molecules against target protein assembly.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryBacteriaBacteriophage lambdaCloning, MolecularGene ExpressionMass ScreeningPeptidesRepressor ProteinsPeptide LibraryPeptidesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.