Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22068424›Full record

Trial reportMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2012

Safety and tolerability of the Easy Vax™ clinical epidermal electroporation system in healthy adults.

Samer S El-Kamary, Melissa Billington, Stephen Deitz, Elaina Colby, Howard Rhinehart, Yukun Wu, William Blackwelder, Robert Edelman, Albert Lee, Alan King

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nanosecond electric pulse effects on gene expression.The Journal of membrane biology · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Samer S El-KamaryDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. selkamar@epi.umaryland.edu
Melissa Billington
Stephen Deitz
Elaina Colby
Howard Rhinehart
Yukun Wu
William Blackwelder
Robert Edelman
Albert Lee
Alan King
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USPulse Biosciences (United States) · USCerenis Therapeutics (France) · FRParents' Place of Maryland · US

Funding

DNA Vaccine Delivery System for Biodefense with dengueR44AI055212 · NIAID · CYTO PULSE SCIENCES, INC. · PI KING, ALAN D. · 2004 to 2008
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 3R44 AI055212-05S1NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI055212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccines are cost-effective and versatile, though intracellular delivery has been challenging in humans. Alternative delivery modalities such as electroporation have demonstrated improved immune responses, but are painful. In this single-center, double-blind, medical device trial, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of Easy Vax™ dermal electroporation system, alone (without DNA) in healthy adults. Three randomized protocol doses were administered to 10 subjects (80% white, 60% female, mean age: 32.1 years) in each of two areas (total of six doses). Two subjects complained of shooting pain, burning and/or tingling when doses were administered to the forearm region, but not the lateral deltoid regions. Subsequent doses for the remaining eight subjects were restricted to the deltoid regions only. Tolerability pain scores never exceeded 3 of 10 in the 11-Point Pain Rating scale, and 12 of 100 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and lower in follow-up evaluations (P < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the three dosing protocols. Electrical properties of the skin, measured automatically by the device, showed no correlation between pain intensity and skin conductance. In conclusion, the Easy Vax™ electroporation device is safe and well tolerated when administered over the lateral deltoid skin regions in healthy volunteers.

Indexed as

EpidermisAdultElectroporationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID22068424
PMCPMC3255586
OpenAlexW2012113335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.