ArticlePharmaceutical research2012
Pharmacokinetic modeling to assess factors affecting the oral bioavailability of the lactone and carboxylate forms of the lipophilic camptothecin analogue AR-67 in rats.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticles from Gantrez-based conjugates for the oral delivery of camptothecin.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2021Article
- Oral etoposide and zosuquidar bioavailability in rats: Effect of co-administration andInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2021Article
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors.Investigational new drugs · 2019Article
- Therapeutic Potential and Utility of Elacridar with Respect to P-glycoprotein Inhibition: An Insight from the Published In Vitro, Preclinical and Clinical Studies.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCamptothecin analogues are anticancer drugs effective when dosed in protracted schedules. Such treatment is best suited for oral formulations. AR-67 is a novel lipophilic analogue with potent efficacy in preclinical models. Here we assessed factors that may influence its oral bioavailability in rats.
methodsPlasma pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted following administration of AR-67 lactone or carboxylate doses alone or after pre-dosing with inhibitors of the efflux transporters P-gp and Bcrp. A population PK model that simultaneously fitted to oral and intravenous data was used to estimate the bioavailability (F) and clearance of AR-67.
resultsAn inverse Gaussian function was used as the oral input into the model and provided the best fits. Covariate analysis showed that the bioavailability of the lactone, but not its clearance, was dose dependent. Consistent with this observation, the bioavailability of AR-67 increased when animals were pretreated orally with GF120918 or Zosuquidar.
conclusionAbsorption of AR-67 is likely affected by solubility of its lactone form and interaction with efflux pumps in the gut. AR-67 appears to be absorbed as the lactone form, most likely due to gastric pH favoring its formation and predominance. F increased at higher doses suggesting saturation of efflux mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.