Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22067163›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Size distribution of amyloid nanofibrils.

Raffaela Cabriolu, Dimo Kashchiev, Stefan Auer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffaela CabrioluCentre for Molecular Nanoscience, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Dimo Kashchiev
Stefan Auer
University of Leeds · GBBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the size distribution of amyloid nanofibrils (protofilaments) in nucleating protein solutions when the nucleation process occurs by the mechanism of direct polymerization of β-strands (extended peptides or protein segments) into β-sheets. Employing the atomistic nucleation theory, we derive a general expression for the stationary size distribution of amyloid nanofibrils constituted of successively layered β-sheets. The application of this expression to amyloid β(1-40) (Aβ(40)) fibrils allows us to determine the nanofibril size distribution as a function of the protein concentration and temperature. The distribution is most remarkable with its exhibiting a series of peaks positioned at "magic" nanofibril sizes (or lengths), which are due to deep local minima in the work for fibril formation. This finding of magic sizes or lengths is consistent with experimental results for the size distribution of aggregates in solutions of Aβ(40) proteins. Also, our approach makes it possible to gain insight into the effect of point mutations on the nanofibril size distribution, an effect that may play a role in experimentally observed substantial differences in the fibrillation lag-time of wild-type and point-mutated amyloid-β proteins.

Indexed as

Particle SizeAmino Acid SequenceAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesNanofibersPoint MutationProtein Structure, SecondarySolubilityThermodynamicsAmyloidAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID22067163
PMCPMC3207154
OpenAlexW1974582571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.