Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22066010›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Pathobiological implications of MUC16 expression in pancreatic cancer.

Dhanya Haridas, Subhankar Chakraborty, Moorthy P Ponnusamy, Imayavaramban Lakshmanan, Satyanarayana Rachagani, Eric Cruz, Sushil Kumar, Srustidhar Das, Subodh M Lele, Judy M Anderson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhanya HaridasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Subhankar Chakraborty
Moorthy P Ponnusamy
Imayavaramban Lakshmanan
Satyanarayana Rachagani
Eric Cruz
Sushil Kumar
Srustidhar Das
Subodh M Lele
Judy M Anderson
Uwe A Wittel
Michael A Hollingsworth
Surinder K Batra
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Apar Kishor Ganti · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
Tissue CoreP50CA127297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2008 to 2018
$17.1M
Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic CancerU01CA111294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2004 to 2015
$7.1M
MOLECULAR STUDIES ON MUC4 MUCIN GENER01CA078590 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 1998 to 2011
$2.5M
Molecular Markers for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic CancerR01CA131944 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA036727-2452NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127297NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078590NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131944NCI NIH HHS R01 CA78590NCI NIH HHS U01 CA111294NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA111294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MUC16 (CA125) belongs to a family of high-molecular weight O-glycosylated proteins known as mucins. While MUC16 is well known as a biomarker in ovarian cancer, its expression pattern in pancreatic cancer (PC), the fourth leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States, remains unknown. The aim of our study was to analyze the expression of MUC16 during the initiation, progression and metastasis of PC for possible implication in PC diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. In this study, a microarray containing tissues from healthy and PC patients was used to investigate the differential protein expression of MUC16 in PC. MUC16 mRNA levels were also measured by RT-PCR in the normal human pancreatic, pancreatitis, and PC tissues. To investigate its expression pattern during PC metastasis, tissue samples from the primary pancreatic tumor and metastases (from the same patient) in the lymph nodes, liver, lung and omentum from Stage IV PC patients were analyzed. To determine its association in the initiation of PC, tissues from PC patients containing pre-neoplastic lesions of varying grades were stained for MUC16. Finally, MUC16 expression was analyzed in 18 human PC cell lines. MUC16 is not expressed in the normal pancreatic ducts and is strongly upregulated in PC and detected in pancreatitis tissue. It is first detected in the high-grade pre-neoplastic lesions preceding invasive adenocarcinoma, suggesting that its upregulation is a late event during the initiation of this disease. MUC16 expression appears to be stronger in metastatic lesions when compared to the primary tumor, suggesting a role in PC metastasis. We have also identified PC cell lines that express MUC16, which can be used in future studies to elucidate its functional role in PC. Altogether, our results reveal that MUC16 expression is significantly increased in PC and could play a potential role in the progression of this disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBlotting, WesternCA-125 AntigenCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalNeoplasm MetastasisPancreatic DuctsPancreatic NeoplasmsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22066010
PMCPMC3204976
OpenAlexW1992083261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.