Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22065773›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist can rescue the impaired postimplantation development of cloned mouse embryos.

Shogo Matoba, Kimiko Inoue, Takashi Kohda, Michihiko Sugimoto, Eiji Mizutani, Narumi Ogonuki, Toshinobu Nakamura, Kuniya Abe, Toru Nakano, Fumitoshi Ishino and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antisense Oligonucleotide-MediatedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cloning by SCNT: Integrating Technical and Biology-Driven Advances.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  15. Knockdown of YY1 InhibitsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shogo MatobaRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Kimiko Inoue
Takashi Kohda
Michihiko Sugimoto
Eiji Mizutani
Narumi Ogonuki
Toshinobu Nakamura
Kuniya Abe
Toru Nakano
Fumitoshi Ishino
Atsuo Ogura
RIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPOsaka University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cloning mammals by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is highly inefficient. Most SCNT-generated embryos die after implantation because of unidentified, complex epigenetic errors in the process of postimplantation embryonic development. Here we identify the most upstream level of dysfunction leading to impaired development of clones by using RNAi against Xist, a gene responsible for X chromosome inactivation (XCI). A prior injection of Xist-specific siRNA into reconstructed oocytes efficiently corrected SCNT-specific aberrant Xist expression at the morula stage, but failed to do so thereafter at the blastocyst stage. However, we found that shortly after implantation, this aberrant XCI status in cloned embryos had been corrected autonomously in both embryonic and extraembryonic tissues, probably through a newly established XCI control for postimplantation embryos. Embryo transfer experiments revealed that siRNA-treated embryos showed 10 times higher survival than controls as early as embryonic day 5.5 and this high survival persisted until term, resulting in a remarkable improvement in cloning efficiency (12% vs. 1% in controls). Importantly, unlike control clones, these Xist-siRNA clones at birth showed only a limited dysregulation of their gene expression, indicating that correction of Xist expression in preimplantation embryos had a long-term effect on their postnatal normality. Thus, contrary to the general assumption, our results suggest that the fate of cloned embryos is determined almost exclusively before implantation by their XCI status. Furthermore, our strategy provides a promising breakthrough for mammalian SCNT cloning, because RNAi treatment of oocytes is readily applicable to most mammal species.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRNA InterferenceAnimalsBlastocystCloning, MolecularEmbryonic DevelopmentHydroxamic AcidsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBAMorulaOocytesRNARNA, Long NoncodingHydroxamic AcidsRNARNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Small InterferingRNA, Untranslatedtrichostatin AXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID22065773
PMCPMC3251083
OpenAlexW1997100349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.