ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2011
Experimental approaches to evaluate the contributions of candidate protein-coding mutations to phenotypic evolution.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra-host genomic variation of serologically nontypeableMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- New Zealand Tree and Giant Wētā (Orthoptera) Transcriptomics Reveal Divergent Selection Patterns in Metabolic Loci.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Functional Genomic Insights into Regulatory Mechanisms of High-Altitude Adaptation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016Review
- Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2015Review
- Types and effects of protein variations.Human genetics · 2015Article
- Intraspecific polymorphism, interspecific divergence, and the origins of function-altering mutations in deer mouse hemoglobin.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Integrating evolutionary and functional tests of adaptive hypotheses: a case study of altitudinal differentiation in hemoglobin function in an Andean Sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying mechanisms of molecular adaptation can provide important insights into the process of phenotypic evolution, but it can be exceedingly difficult to quantify the phenotypic effects of specific mutational changes. To verify the adaptive significance of genetically based changes in protein function, it is necessary to document functional differences between the products of derived and wild-type alleles and to demonstrate that such differences impinge on higher-level physiological processes (and ultimately, fitness). In the case of metabolic enzymes, this requires documenting in vivo differences in reaction rate that give rise to differences in flux through the pathway in which the enzymes function. These measured differences in pathway flux should then give rise to differences in cellular or systemic physiology that affect fitness-related variation in whole-organism performance. Efforts to establish these causal connections between genotype, phenotype, and fitness require experiments that carefully control for environmental variation and background genetic variation. Here, we discuss experimental approaches to evaluate the contributions of amino-acid mutations to adaptive phenotypic change. We discuss conceptual and methodological issues associated with in vitro and in vivo studies of protein function, and the evolutionary insights that can be gleaned from such studies. We also discuss the importance of isolating the effects of individual mutations to distinguish between positively selected substitutions that directly contribute to improvements in protein function versus positively selected, compensatory substitutions that mitigate negative pleiotropic effects of antecedent changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.