ArticleNeuroradiology2012
The place for remodeling technique and stenting in the endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms: a single-center analysis from 2008 to 2010.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Narrative Review in Managing Ventral Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Discrepancy between two-dimensional and three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for the planning of endovascular coiling of small cerebral aneurysms <5 mm.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020Article
- Early Experience with the TransForm™ Occlusion Balloon Catheter: A Single-Center Study.Interventional neurology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to analyze the place for the balloon remodeling and stenting in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms as well as the impact of their use on the failure and complications rates. Analysis was conducted in a recent 3-year period (2008-2010) in a single center.
methodsA total of 287 aneurysms, harbored by 252 patients (age, 16-87 years; mean, 50.9 ± 13.4 years), were proposed for endovascular treatment. Patient and aneurysms characteristics, modalities of treatment (coiling, remodeling, or stenting), failure rate, and rate of adverse events related to the treatment were analyzed.
resultsTreatment failed in 3/287 aneurysms (1.0%). The use of the remodeling technique and stenting increased over time (23.9% and 4.6% in 2008, 39.5% and 14.9% in 2009, and 43.9% and 20.7% in 2010, respectively). The remodeling technique was used in a similar percentage of cases independent of aneurysm characteristics (aneurysm status, location, and size, and neck size), except dome-to-neck ratio. Stenting was more frequently used in unruptured aneurysms, in internal carotid artery aneurysms, and in wide neck aneurysms. The rate of specific adverse events (thromboembolism and intraoperative rupture) was similar in coiling (2.8%), remodeling (6.9%), and stenting (1.1%). The rate of specific adverse events was similar in 2008, 2009, and 2010 (2.3%, 4.4%, and 6.1%, respectively).
conclusionIn the endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms, the large use of the remodeling technique combined with stenting in selected cases enables a low rate of treatment failures without increasing the rate of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22064966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.