Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22064161›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2012

Reward activity in satiated overweight women is decreased during unbiased viewing but increased when imagining taste: an event-related fMRI study.

A Frankort, A Roefs, N Siep, A Roebroeck, R Havermans, A Jansen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural vulnerability factors for obesity.Clinical psychology review · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Brain-based etiology of weight regulation.Current diabetes reports · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A FrankortDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. astrid.frankort@maastrichtuniversity.nl
A Roefs
N Siep
A Roebroeck
R Havermans
A Jansen
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was to investigate reward-related brain activity in satiated overweight and healthy-weight participants in response to high-calorie palatable food pictures, when viewing the pictures without prior instructions (called unbiased viewing) versus imagining the taste of the shown pictures (called taste imagination). We predicted that neural activation in brain reward regions would be greater in overweight participants than in healthy-weight ones and that this difference between groups would be strongest during unbiased viewing.

methodNeural activation was measured using fMRI in 14 overweight (mean body mass index (BMI): 29.8 kg m(-2)) and 15 healthy-weight (mean BMI: 21.1 kg m(-2)) participants who were satiated, in response to palatable and unpalatable high-calorie and low-calorie food pictures, presented in an event-related design during two conditions: unbiased viewing (no prior instructions) versus taste imagination.

resultsA group × condition interaction was found in 14 brain regions involved in food reward processing during the presentation of high-calorie palatable food stimuli. During the taste imagination condition, neural activation in these regions was greater in the overweight participants than in the healthy-weight ones. Contrary to our expectations, the opposite pattern was observed during unbiased viewing: activation in reward regions in the overweight participants was reduced compared with the healthy-weight ones. In all brain reward regions except for the left amygdala, the group × condition interaction was specific to high-calorie palatable food stimuli.

conclusionGreater reward activity in the overweight participants compared with the control group when imagining taste may represent an increased reward response induced by high-calorie palatable food. During unbiased viewing, reduced reward activation in the overweight participants compared with those with a healthy weight may reflect avoidance of high-calorie palatable food stimuli. Taken together, this pattern of activation may reflect ambivalence in the overweight group between desire for (in the taste imagination condition) and avoidance of (in the unbiased viewing condition) high-calorie palatable food stimuli.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSatiationAdultCuesFemaleFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingObesityPhotic StimulationPostprandial PeriodPrefrontal CortexReward

Identifiers

PMID22064161
OpenAlexW2049326672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.