Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22061480›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2012

Functional genomics identifies neural stem cell sub-type expression profiles and genes regulating neuroblast homeostasis.

Travis D Carney, Michael R Miller, Kristin J Robinson, Omer A Bayraktar, Jessica A Osterhout, Chris Q Doe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Differential control of Yorkie activity by LKB1/AMPK and the Hippo/Warts cascade in the central nervous system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Travis D CarneyInstitute of Molecular Biology, Institute of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Michael R Miller
Kristin J Robinson
Omer A Bayraktar
Jessica A Osterhout
Chris Q Doe
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007348 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Chris Q Doe, KRYN STANKUNAS · 1989 to 2026
$6.8M
GENETIC AND MOLECULAR STUDIES OF NEUROGENESISR01HD027056 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Chris Q Doe · 1989 to 2026
$5.0M
Genetic and Molecular Studies of NeurogenesisR37HD027056 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI DOE, CHRIS Q · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD027056NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD27056NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD027056NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007348NICHD NIH HHS T32-HD07348NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila larval central brain contains about 10,000 differentiated neurons and 200 scattered neural progenitors (neuroblasts), which can be further subdivided into ~95 type I neuroblasts and eight type II neuroblasts per brain lobe. Only type II neuroblasts generate self-renewing intermediate neural progenitors (INPs), and consequently each contributes more neurons to the brain, including much of the central complex. We characterized six different mutant genotypes that lead to expansion of neuroblast numbers; some preferentially expand type II or type I neuroblasts. Transcriptional profiling of larval brains from these mutant genotypes versus wild-type allowed us to identify small clusters of transcripts enriched in type II or type I neuroblasts, and we validated these clusters by gene expression analysis. Unexpectedly, only a few genes were found to be differentially expressed between type I/II neuroblasts, suggesting that these genes play a large role in establishing the different cell types. We also identified a large group of genes predicted to be expressed in all neuroblasts but not in neurons. We performed a neuroblast-specific, RNAi-based functional screen and identified 84 genes that are required to maintain proper neuroblast numbers; all have conserved mammalian orthologs. These genes are excellent candidates for regulating neural progenitor self-renewal in Drosophila and mammals.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsBrainCluster AnalysisDrosophilaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomicsGenotypeHomeostasisLarvaMicroarray AnalysisMicroscopy, ConfocalNeural Stem CellsRNA Interference

Identifiers

PMID22061480
PMCPMC4110207
OpenAlexW2116396547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.