Trial reportTrials2011
A randomised controlled trial of probiotics for the prevention of spontaneous preterm delivery associated with bacterial vaginosis: preliminary results.
Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Trial for the Prevention of Premature Birth and Neonatal Related Morbidity
Preventing Preterm Birth With Probiotics - Pilot Randomised Trial
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal probiotic supplementation and offspring health: an umbrella review with re-analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Pro/Prebiotics Alone over Pro/Prebiotics Combined with Conventional Antibiotic Therapy to Treat Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Are Probiotics and Prebiotics Safe for Use during Pregnancy and Lactation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Maternal probiotic supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pregnancy outcomes in women taking probiotics or prebiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Oral Probiotics to Prevent Recurrent Vulvovaginal Infections During Pregnancy-Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Effect of Oral ProbioticNutrients · 2020Trial
- Effects of oral probiotic supplements on vaginal microbiota during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with microbiome analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020Trial
- Yogurt consumption during pregnancy and preterm delivery in Mexican women: A prospective analysis of interaction with maternal overweight status.Maternal & child nutrition · 2018Trial
- The role of probiotics in restoring and maintaining vaginal microbiome health: a review.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- Early Roots of Childhood Obesity: Risk Factors, Mechanisms, and Prevention Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Probiotics in the Prophylaxis of Premature Rupture of Membranes and Cervical Incompetence.Nutrients · 2024Review
- The Immunomodulatory Role of Regulatory T Cells in Preterm Birth and Associated Pregnancy Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus species: considerations for female reproduction and offspring health.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Nutraceuticals in Pregnancy: A Special Focus on Probiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Vaginal and oral probiotics effect in the prevention of preterm delivery in patients visiting Kamali Hospital, Karaj, Iran in 2020.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2022Article
- Changes in the Gut Microbiome and Pathologies in Pregnancy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Association between Gut Microbiota and Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial vaginosis increases the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at less than 34 weeks of gestation.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the early administration of selected lactobacilli strains (probiotics) to pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis/intermediate-degree infections to prevent spontaneous premature delivery and associated neonatal morbidity. METHODS/
designAsymptomatic pregnant women at less than 20 weeks of gestation, with no indication of elective preterm delivery, with a vaginal pH ≥ 4.5 and Nugent score > 3 were randomly assigned to the placebo or intervention group (oral administration of selected lactobacilli up to the 24th to 26th week of gestation). The randomisation was stratified for the history of premature delivery (HPD) and blocked. The allocation was concealed, and the participating health professionals and patients were blinded. The primary outcome was preterm delivery (<34 to <32 weeks), and the secondary outcomes were associated neonatal complications.
resultsIn total, 4,204 pregnant women were screened; 320 and 324 individuals were respectively randomly assigned to the placebo and intervention groups, and 62% finished the trial. None of the randomised patients were lost to follow-up. For the non-HPD stratum, the intent-to-treat relative risks of spontaneous premature birth at < 34 and < 37 weeks' gestation were 0.33 (0.03, 3.16) and 0.49 (0.17, 1.44), respectively, and they were non-significant (ns) with p = 0.31 and 0.14. The corresponding actual treatment figures were zero and 0.32 (0.09, 1.19), which were ns with p = 0.12 and 0.06. The intent-to-treat relative risk of spontaneous premature birth at < 37 weeks of gestation for the trial as a whole, including HPD and non-HPD participants, was 0.69 (0.26, 1.78), p = 0.30 (ns). The neonatal complications under evaluation occurred in only one infant (< 34 weeks; placebo group) who presented with respiratory distress syndrome and suspected early neonatal sepsis. The recorded adverse events were minor and relatively non-specific.
conclusionsThe efficacy of the tested probiotics to prevent preterm delivery among women without a history of preterm delivery was not determined because the study sample was insufficient to estimate statistically significant intent-to-treat effects; additional studies are needed to evaluate this intervention among these women.
trial registrationTrial registration at NIH register: NCT00303082. Sources of funding: the Brazilian Health Ministry and the State of Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.