Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22059117›Full record

ArticleMycology2011

Approaches to Fungal Genome Annotation.

Brian J Haas, Qiandong Zeng, Matthew D Pearson, Christina A Cuomo, Jennifer R Wortman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Buscogeny: A BUSCO leveraged phylogenomic tree builder.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Genomic, Proteomic, and Biochemical Study ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Biparental inheritance of germline-specific chromosomes in the sea lamprey and their roles in oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A fully phased, chromosome-scale genome of sugar beet line FC309 enables the discovery of Fusarium yellows resistance QTL.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian J HaasGenome Sequencing and Analysis Program, Broad Institute, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, U.S.A.
Qiandong Zeng
Matthew D Pearson
Christina A Cuomo
Jennifer R Wortman

Funding

Large Scale Sequencing and Analysis of GenomesU54HG003067 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY, LANDER, ERIC S · 2004 to 2015
$568.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal genome annotation is the starting point for analysis of genome content. This generally involves the application of diverse methods to identify features on a genome assembly such as protein-coding and non-coding genes, repeats and transposable elements, and pseudogenes. Here we describe tools and methods leveraged for eukaryotic genome annotation with a focus on the annotation of fungal nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. We highlight the application of the latest technologies and tools to improve the quality of predicted gene sets. The Broad Institute eukaryotic genome annotation pipeline is described as one example of how such methods and tools are integrated into a sequencing center's production genome annotation environment.

Identifiers

PMID22059117
PMCPMC3207268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.