Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22058660›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of materials research2011

Mussel-Inspired Adhesives and Coatings.

Bruce P Lee, P B Messersmith, J N Israelachvili, J H Waite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of materials research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 356 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
356citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

356 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A biofilm-derived peptide as an underwater adhesive.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Nanocondensate bioadhesive delivery via metal-halogenated catechol coordination in tunicate rhizoid holdfasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Identification and characterization of a wet adhesive protein extracted fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

296 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce P LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931; bpl4@yahoo.com.
P B Messersmith
J N Israelachvili
J H Waite

Funding

Translating Mussel AdhesionR01DE018468 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI WAITE, JOHN HERBERT · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mussels attach to solid surfaces in the sea. Their adhesion must be rapid, strong, and tough, or else they will be dislodged and dashed to pieces by the next incoming wave. Given the dearth of synthetic adhesives for wet polar surfaces, much effort has been directed to characterizing and mimicking essential features of the adhesive chemistry practiced by mussels. Studies of these organisms have uncovered important adaptive strategies that help to circumvent the high dielectric and solvation properties of water that typically frustrate adhesion. In a chemical vein, the adhesive proteins of mussels are heavily decorated with Dopa, a catecholic functionality. Various synthetic polymers have been functionalized with catechols to provide diverse adhesive, sealant, coating, and anchoring properties, particularly for critical biomedical applications.

Identifiers

PMID22058660
PMCPMC3207216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.