Trial reportHaematologica2012
European Bone Marrow Working Group trial on reproducibility of World Health Organization criteria to discriminate essential thrombocythemia from prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive multiparametric characterization of essential thrombocythemia, premyelofibrosis, and overt myelofibrosis.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Megakaryocytes in myelofibrosis: mechanisms of fibrotic niche remodeling and therapeutic implications.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- The benchmark illusion: on the curious underestimation of AI and the uncertainty of its creators' gold standards.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Utility of Iron Staining in Bone Marrow Aspirates in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Multi-site bone marrow core biopsy improves diagnostic accuracy in dogs with hematologic disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: recent updates in diagnosis, prognostication, and management 2026.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
- Evolution of WHO diagnostic criteria in "Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms" compared with the International Consensus Classification.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
- Can molecular patterns help to classify overlapping entities in myeloid neoplasms?Histopathology · 2025Review
- Application of IVIM in the assessment of the spleen in patients with myelofibrosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Challenging Dogma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Bone Marrow Histological Diagnostics: Potential Applications and Challenges.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024Review
- Revisiting Circulating Extracellular Matrix Fragments as Disease Markers in Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Multiparametric MRI to quantify disease and treatment response in mice with myeloproliferative neoplasms.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Analysis of genetic variants in myeloproliferative neoplasms using a 22-gene next-generation sequencing panel.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- Review
- Application of Single-Cell Approaches to Study Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Biology.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Low-Risk Essential Thrombocythemia: A Comprehensive Review.HemaSphere · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms discriminates between essential thrombocythemia and the prefibrotic phase of primary myelofibrosis. This discrimination is clinically relevant because essential thrombocythemia is associated with a favorable prognosis whereas patients with primary myelofibrosis have a higher risk of progression to myelofibrosis or blast crisis. DESIGN AND
methodsTo assess the reproducibility of the classification, six hematopathologists from five European countries re-classified 102 non-fibrotic bone marrow trephines, obtained because of sustained thrombocytosis.
resultsConsensus on histological classification defined as at least four identical diagnoses occurred for 63% of the samples. Inter-observer agreement showed low to moderate kappa values (0.28 to 0.57, average 0.41). The percentage of unclassifiable myeloproliferative neoplasms rose from 2% to 23% when minor criteria for primary myelofibrosis were taken into account. In contrast, the frequency of primary myelofibrosis dropped from 23% to 7%, indicating that the majority of patients with a histological diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis did not fulfill the complete criteria for this disease. Thus, over 50% of cases in this series either could not be reproducibly classified or fell into the category of unclassifiable myeloproliferative neoplasms.
conclusionsWorld Health Organization criteria for discrimination of essential thrombocythemia from prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis are poorly to only moderately reproducible and lead to a higher proportion of non-classifiable myeloproliferative neoplasms than histology alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.