Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22058209›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2012

Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results.

Gareth J Morgan, Faith E Davies, Walter M Gregory, Sue E Bell, Alexander J Szubert, Nuria Navarro Coy, Gordon Cook, Sylvia Feyler, Peter R E Johnson, Claudius Rudin and 7 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02424851 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

A Study of Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD) Versus Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) in Patients With Renal Failure Defined as a GFR Below 30 Mls/Min

TypeinterventionalSponsorOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2014 to 2020Enrolled31ConditionsMultiple Myeloma, Chronic Kidney DiseaseArmsBortezomib, Thalidomide, Bendamustine, Dexamethasone
NCT03792620 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Conceptual Study of Daratumumab Intensified Treatment to Eligible Multiple Myeloma New Patients- Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone and Daratumumab Induction, Follow by Daratumumab Consolidation and Maintenance

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-HematologiaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsMultiple Myeloma Stage IArmsCyclo Thal Dex Daratumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Co-Occurrence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities and High-Risk Disease in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Thalidomide treatment for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Diagnostic brain-to-liver [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth J MorganThe Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. gareth.morgan@icr.ac.uk
Faith E Davies
Walter M Gregory
Sue E Bell
Alexander J Szubert
Nuria Navarro Coy
Gordon Cook
Sylvia Feyler
Peter R E Johnson
Claudius Rudin
Mark T Drayson
Roger G Owen
Fiona M Ross
Nigel H Russell
Graham H Jackson
J Anthony Child
National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group
National Cancer Research Institute · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNewcastle University · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0100132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThalidomide is active in multiple myeloma and is associated with minimal myelosuppression, making it a good candidate for induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. DESIGN AND

methodsOral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with infusional cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

resultsThe post-induction overall response rate (≥ partial response) for the intent-to-treat population was significantly higher with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (n=555) versus cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (n=556); 82.5% versus 71.2%; odds ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.55; P<0.0001. The complete response rates were 13.0% with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone and 8.1% with cyclophos-phamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (P=0.0083), with this differential response being maintained in patients who received autologous stem-cell transplantation (post-transplant complete response 50.0% versus 37.2%, respectively; P=0.00052). Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was non-inferior to cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone for progression-free and overall survival, and there was a trend toward a late survival benefit with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone in responders. A trend toward an overall survival advantage for cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone over cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone was also observed in a subgroup of patients with favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Compared with cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was associated with more constipation and somnolence, but a lower incidence of cytopenias.

conclusionsThe cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone regimen showed improved response rates and was not inferior in terms of survival outcomes to the standard infusional regimen of cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Based on its oral administration and the reduced incidence of infection and cytopenia, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexa-methasone may be considered an effective induction therapy option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (ISRCTN: 68454111).

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationInduction ChemotherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaSurvival AnalysisThalidomideTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID22058209
PMCPMC3291601
OpenAlexW2036200625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.