Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22058061›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2012

CSF biomarkers for amyloid and tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.

Hanna Rosenmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fluid biomarker agreement and interrelation in dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. APOE ε4 carriers may undergo synaptic damage conferring risk of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna RosenmannThe Department of Neurology, Agnes Ginges Center for Human Neurogenetics, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein Karem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. rosenman@hadassah.org.il
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are highly needed in the clinic. As a fluid surrounding the brain and reflecting the major neuropathological features characteristic to the AD brain, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides the natural source for AD biomarkers. The expected use of an ideal AD biomarker is for the following purposes: (1) diagnosis, (2) prediction, (3) monitoring of disease progression, and (4) drug discovery. Review of the literature revealed that CSF analysis, specifically amyloid-beta (Aβ42, total (T)-tau, and phosphorylated (P)-tau, are reliable markers for AD diagnosis, even at very early stages, particularly vs. healthy controls, while more limited evidence for distinguishing from other dementias. As for prediction, abnormal CSF markers are predictors of cognitive decline in healthy subjects, converting from MCI to development of AD, and of the rate of cognitive decline in mild AD. Regarding monitoring disease progression, the use of CSF biomarkers does not seem very promising since a comparison of the marker levels between baseline and following years of follow-up revealed a remarkable stability of biomarker levels in CSF. As for the use in drug discovery, it is estimated that using CSF markers for the selection of subjects for clinical trials may reduce robustly sample size and trial costs. Yet, since no effective drug is currently available, the contribution of CSF AD biomarkers in drug discovery cannot be currently fully assessed. Nevertheless, testing CSF for evidence of CNS inflammation may help safety monitoring in AD clinical trials. Factors affecting CSF biomarker levels that should be taken into account are assay variability as well as effects of age, gender, apoE and other genetic variations, education, and time of day. Much effort has been and is still being dedicated into developing and validating CSF AD biomarkers by many centers in the world. Identifying additional CSF components, reflecting not only the lesions characteristic to AD (plaques and tangles) but also more functional and structural brain parameters, may provide a wider profile of the changes taking place in AD brains, and be further used as reliable CSF biomarkers for AD monitoring.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloidosisBiomarkersDrug MonitoringHumansTauopathiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22058061
OpenAlexW2170819436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.