ArticleCurrent microbiology2012
Re-annotation of two hyperthermophilic archaea Pyrococcus abyssi GE5 and Pyrococcus furiosus DSM 3638.
Article in Current microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Transcriptome Map of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae at Single-Nucleotide Resolution Using Deep RNA-Seq.PloS one · 2016Article
- Revisiting the structure/function relationships of H/ACA(-like) RNAs: a unified model for Euryarchaea and Crenarchaea.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- RNA at 92 °C: the non-coding transcriptome of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi.RNA biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyrococcus abyssi GE5 (P. aby) and Pyrococcus furiosus DSM 3638 (P. fur) are two model hyperthermophilic archaea. However, their annotations in public databases are unsatisfactory. In this article, the two genomes were re-annotated according to the following steps. (i) All "hypothetical genes" in the original annotation were re-identified based on the Z-curve method, and some of them were recognized as non-coding open reading frames (ORFs). Evidence showed that the recognized non-coding ORFs were highly unlikely to encode proteins. (ii) The translation initiation sites (TISs) of all the annotated genes were re-located, and more than 10% of the TISs were shifted to 5'-upstream or 3'-downstream regions. (iii) The functions of the refined "hypothetical genes" were predicted using sequence alignment tools, more than 200 originally annotated "hypothetical genes" in either of the two hyperthermophiles were assigned functions. A large number of these functions have reference support or experimentally characterized homologues. All the refined information will serve as a valuable resource for research on P. aby and P. fur, which may be helpful in the exploration of thermal adaptation mechanisms. The complete re-annotation files of P. aby and P. fur are available at http://211.69.128.148/download/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.