Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22057053›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2011

In silico feedback for in vivo regulation of a gene expression circuit.

Andreas Milias-Argeitis, Sean Summers, Jacob Stewart-Ornstein, Ignacio Zuleta, David Pincus, Hana El-Samad, Mustafa Khammash, John Lygeros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Live-cell imaging powered by computation.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Construction and Characterization of Light-Responsive Transcriptional Systems.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Platforms for Optogenetic Stimulation and Feedback Control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas Milias-ArgeitisDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Automatic Control Laboratory, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sean Summers
Jacob Stewart-Ornstein
Ignacio Zuleta
David Pincus
Hana El-Samad
Mustafa Khammash
John Lygeros

Funding

Rewiring Therapeutic Cells: User-Controlled T Cells and Stem CellsP50GM081879 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIM, WENDELL A · 2010 to 2017
$19.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We show that difficulties in regulating cellular behavior with synthetic biological circuits may be circumvented using in silico feedback control. By tracking a circuit's output in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in real time, we precisely control its behavior using an in silico feedback algorithm to compute regulatory inputs implemented through a genetically encoded light-responsive module. Moving control functions outside the cell should enable more sophisticated manipulation of cellular processes whenever real-time measurements of cellular variables are possible.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsComputational BiologyFeedbackGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID22057053
PMCPMC4565053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.