Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22056952›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2012

MYC gene amplification is often acquired in lethal distant breast cancer metastases of unamplified primary tumors.

Aatur D Singhi, Ashley Cimino-Mathews, Robert B Jenkins, Fusheng Lan, Stephanie R Fink, Hind Nassar, Russell Vang, John H Fetting, Jessica Hicks, Saraswati Sukumar and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanical stress during confined migration causes aberrant mitoses and c-MYC amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aatur D SinghiDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Robert B Jenkins
Fusheng Lan
Stephanie R Fink
Hind Nassar
Russell Vang
John H Fetting
Jessica Hicks
Saraswati Sukumar
Angelo M De Marzo
Pedram Argani
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

VACCINES--A NEW PARADIGM FOR BREAST CANCERP50CA088843 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, NANCY ELLEN · 2000 to 2010
$27.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA 88843NCI NIH HHS P50 CA088843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast cancer, amplification of MYC is consistently observed in aggressive forms of disease and correlates with poor prognosis and distant metastases. However, to date, a systematic analysis of MYC amplification in metastatic breast cancers has not been reported. Specifically, whether the MYC amplification status may change in metastases in comparison to the corresponding primary breast tumor, and potential variability among different metastases within the same patient have also not been assessed. We generated single patient tissue microarrays consisting of both primary breast carcinomas and multiple matched systemic metastases from 15 patients through our previously described rapid autopsy program. In total, the 15 tissue microarrays contained 145 primary tumor spots and 778 spots derived from 180 different metastases. In addition, two separate tissue microarrays were constructed composed of 10 matched primary breast cancers and corresponding solitary metastases sampled not at autopsy but rather in routine surgical resections. These two tissue microarrays totaled 50 primary tumor spots and 86 metastatic tumor spots. For each case, hormone receptor status, HER2/neu, EGFR and CK5/6 expression were assessed, and the cases were characterized as luminal, basal-like or HER2 based on published criteria. Both fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for MYC was performed on all cases. Of the 25 cases, 24 were evaluable. While 4 of 24 primary tumors (16%) demonstrated MYC amplification, an additional 6 (25% of total evaluable cases) acquired MYC amplification in their systemic metastases. Of note, there was remarkably little heterogeneity in MYC copy number among different metastases from the same patient. MYC immunoreactivity was increased in metastases relative to matched primaries in the surgical cohort, although there was no perfect correlation with MYC amplification. In conclusion, amplification of MYC is a frequent event in breast cancer, but occurs more frequently as a diffuse, acquired event in metastatic disease than in the corresponding primary. These observations underscore the importance of MYC in breast cancer progression/metastasis, as well as its relevance as a potential therapeutic target in otherwise incurable metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGenes, mycAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCohort StudiesDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID22056952
PMCPMC3276715
OpenAlexW1984919410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.