ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011
Selection for higher gene copy number after different types of plant gene duplications.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interplay between gene expression and gene architecture as a consequence of gene and genome duplications: evidence from metabolic genes ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Article
- Phosphorylation of MdERF17 by MdMPK4 promotes apple fruit peel degreening during light/dark transitions.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- A New Pipeline for Removing Paralogs in Target Enrichment Data.Systematic biology · 2022Article
- Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times.The Plant cell · 2021Review
- The Evolution of Gene Duplicates in Angiosperms and the Impact of Protein-Protein Interactions and the Mechanism of Duplication.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- The effects of repeated whole genome duplication events on the evolution of cytokinin signaling pathway.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Different Modes of Gene Duplication Show Divergent Evolutionary Patterns and Contribute Differently to the Expansion of Gene Families Involved in Important Fruit Traits in Pear (Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Evolution of Rosaceae Fruit Types Based on Nuclear Phylogeny in the Context of Geological Times and Genome Duplication.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Both mechanism and age of duplications contribute to biased gene retention patterns in plants.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Multiple Polyploidization Events across Asteraceae with Two Nested Events in the Early History Revealed by Nuclear Phylogenomics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Variation in transcriptome size: are we getting the message?Chromosoma · 2015Review
- Polyploid evolution of the Brassicaceae during the Cenozoic era.The Plant cell · 2014Article
- Extensive translational regulation of gene expression in an allopolyploid (Glycine dolichocarpa).The Plant cell · 2014Article
- Different evolutionary histories of two cation/proton exchanger gene families in plants.BMC plant biology · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolutionary origins of the multitude of duplicate genes in the plant genomes are still incompletely understood. To gain an appreciation of the potential selective forces acting on these duplicates, we phylogenetically inferred the set of metabolic gene families from 10 flowering plant (angiosperm) genomes. We then compared the metabolic fluxes for these families, predicted using the Arabidopsis thaliana and Sorghum bicolor metabolic networks, with the families' duplication propensities. For duplications produced by both small scale (small-scale duplications) and genome duplication (whole-genome duplications), there is a significant association between the flux and the tendency to duplicate. Following this global analysis, we made a more fine-scale study of the selective constraints observed on plant sodium and phosphate transporters. We find that the different duplication mechanisms give rise to differing selective constraints. However, the exact nature of this pattern varies between the gene families, and we argue that the duplication mechanism alone does not define a duplicated gene's subsequent evolutionary trajectory. Collectively, our results argue for the interplay of history, function, and selection in shaping the duplicate gene evolution in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.