Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22056254›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and biology2012

Evaluation of copper-64-labeled somatostatin agonists and antagonist in SSTr2-transfected cell lines that are positive and negative for p53: implications for cancer therapy.

Kim Nguyen, Jesse J Parry, Buck E Rogers, Carolyn J Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Somatostatin analogues labeled with copper radioisotopes: current status.Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Imaging and therapy of hSSTR2-transfected tumors using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A purification system forJournal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim NguyenMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jesse J Parry
Buck E Rogers
Carolyn J Anderson
Washington University in St. Louis · USMallinckrodt (United States) · US

Funding

RESEARCH RESOURCE IN RADIONUCLIDE RESEARCHR24CA086307 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WELCH, MICHAEL J. · 1999 to 2009
$8.4M
RECEPTOR-TARGETED COPPER RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS FOR CANCER IMAGING AND THERAPYR01CA064475 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, CAROLYN J. · 1999 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA064475NCI NIH HHS R24 CA086307NCI NIH HHS R24 CA86307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadiolabeled somatostatin analogs have become important agents for molecular imaging and targeted radiotherapy of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. Here we determine the effect of the tumor suppressor protein, p53, on trafficking (64)Cu to tumor cell nuclei from DOTA vs. CB-TE2A-conjugated agonist Y3-TATE and the antagonist (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT in cell lines that are positive or negative for p53.

methodsReceptor binding, internalization, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and nuclear localization studies were performed with the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTr2) agonists, (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE and (64)Cu-DOTA-Y3-TATE vs. antagonist, (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT, in SSTr2-transfected p53 +/+ and -/- HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells.

resultsThe antagonist, (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT, bound 8-9-fold more SSTr2 binding sites than did the (64)Cu-labeled agonists. (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE was more efficiently internalized than (64)Cu-DOTA-Y3-TATE, while (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT showed lower yet significant levels of internalization. CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE acted as a full agonist, inhibiting cAMP production, whereas CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT showed no inhibition of cAMP production. The (64)Cu from agonists (64)Cu-DOTA-Y3-TATE and (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE showed greater nuclear localization at 24 h in p53 +/+ vs. -/- cells; however, there was no difference in the levels of (64)Cu from the antagonist based on p53 status. Surprisingly, the DOTA and CB-TE2A-conjugated agonists showed similar nuclear localization in the p53 +/+ and -/- cells, suggesting no difference in (64)Cu release from these chelators in the HCT116 cell lines.

conclusionBased on these in vitro data, the agonist (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE demonstrates the most promise as an agent for targeted radiotherapy in p53 positive, SSTr2-positive tumors.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCoordination ComplexesCopper RadioisotopesHumansPeptidesReceptors, SomatostatinTransfectionTumor Suppressor Protein p5364Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE64Cu-DOTA-Y3-TATECoordination ComplexesCopper RadioisotopesPeptidesReceptors, Somatostatinsomatostatin receptor 2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22056254
PMCPMC3268844
OpenAlexW2099879304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.