ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011
Patients' needs following colorectal cancer diagnosis: where does primary care fit in?
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The gap between guidelines and clinical practice in cancer-related fatigue management: a mixed-methods systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017Pooled it
- The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016Pooled it
- Understanding Colorectal Cancer Patient Experiences with Family Practitioners in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Exploring Psychosocial Needs of Patients with Cancers through the Lens of the Physicians and Nurses: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Need differences by treatment phases between patients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers: A text mining analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Development, implementation and evaluation a palliative care program for colorectal cancer patients: a mixed methods protocol study.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
- The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: A narrative review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- Experiences of cancer survivors in Europe: Has anything changed? Can artificial intelligence offer a solution?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' treatment burden and their supportive work to ameliorate the burden - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Living and dying with metastatic bowel cancer: Serial in-depth interviews with patients.European journal of cancer care · 2018Article
- Assessing cancer patients' quality of life and supportive care needs: Translation-revalidation of the CARES in Flemish and exhaustive evaluation of concurrent validity.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Proactive cancer care in primary care: a mixed-methods study.Family practice · 2013Article
- Factors related with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2013Article
- Cancer and primary care: the clinical and research agenda.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedMitchell, Liz [corrected to Mitchell, Elizabeth]
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Patients with colorectal cancer spend most of their time in the community, but the role of primary care in their management and follow-up is unclear.
aimTo explore colorectal cancer patients' experiences of psychosocial problems and their management in primary and specialist care. DESIGN AND
settingLongitudinal qualitative study of participants recruited from three hospitals in the west of Scotland and interviewed in their own homes.
methodIn-depth interviews with 24 participants with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and then follow-up interviews 12 months later.
resultsParticipants' needs following a diagnosis for colorectal cancer included physical, psychological, and social issues. GPs played a key role in diagnosis, after which they were less involved. Participants valued GPs making unsolicited contact and offering support. Participants described being well supported by clinical nurse specialists who are expert in the illness, and who provide continuity of care and psychological support. A year after diagnosis, when there was less contact with GPs and clinical nurse specialists, participants still faced challenges associated with the ongoing impact of colorectal cancer.
conclusionWhile some patients enjoyed straightforward recoveries from surgery, others experienced longer-term implications from their disease and treatment, particularly bowel-function issues, fatigue, anxiety, and sexual problems. The potential for primary care to contribute more to the ongoing care of colorectal cancer patients was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.