ReviewDrugs & aging2011
Spotlight on rivastigmine transdermal patch: in dementia of the Alzheimer's type.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro and in Vivo Optimization of Phase Sensitive Smart Polymer for Controlled Delivery of Rivastigmine for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- The transdermal formulation of rivastigmine improves caregiver burden and treatment adherence of patients with Alzheimer's disease under daily practice conditions.International journal of clinical practice · 2014Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rivastigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is available as a transdermal patch (Exelon® patch, Rivastach® patch, Prometax® patch) for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Rivastigmine transdermal patch was effective, in terms of improving cognitive and global function, and generally well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's type in a large, well designed trial. Most adverse events associated with rivastigmine patch were mild to moderate in severity, with the patch generally better tolerated than oral rivastigmine, especially in terms of cholinergic gastrointestinal adverse events. The patch also had good skin adhesion and a favourable skin tolerability profile in this study, with most application-site reactions being mild in severity. Additionally, in a safety and tolerability study, rivastigmine patch, regardless of concomitant memantine therapy, was generally well tolerated in patients switching from oral donepezil therapy. Thus, current evidence suggests that rivastigmine transdermal patch is an effective treatment option for patients with Alzheimer's disease, with the potential for improving compliance and providing sustained clinical benefit because of its ease of use and generally favourable tolerability profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.