Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22054017›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2011

Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in improving lipid level in patients with dyslipidemia assisted by general practitioners: Dislip-EM study protocol.

Luis A Pérula, Josep M Bosch, Julia Bóveda, Manuel Campiñez, Nieves Barragán, Juan C Arboniés, Jose A Prados, Enrique Martín, Remedios Martín, Josep Massons and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01282190 (Effectiveness of Motivational Interview in Patients With Dyslipidemia Treated in Primary Care Consultations), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01282190 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Motivational Interview in Patients With Dyslipidemia Treated in Primary Care Consultations (Dislip-EM Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Reina Sofia de CordobaRan2010 to 2015Enrolled207ConditionsPatients With DyslipidemiaArmsMotivational interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. [25 Years of health & communication].Atencion primaria · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Luis A PérulaUniversidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain. luisangel.perula@gmail.com
Josep M Bosch
Julia Bóveda
Manuel Campiñez
Nieves Barragán
Juan C Arboniés
Jose A Prados
Enrique Martín
Remedios Martín
Josep Massons
Margarita Criado
Roger Ruiz
José A Fernández
Francisco Buitrago
Inmaculada Olaya
Modesto Pérez
Joaquin Ruiz
Andalusian Health Service · ESConsorci d’Atenció Primària de Salut Barcelona Esquerra · ESUniversity of Córdoba · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESDepartamento de Salud · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESServicio Aragonés de Salud · ESServicio Gallego de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe non-pharmacological approach to cholesterol control in patients with hyperlipidemia is based on the promotion of a healthy diet and physical activity. Thus, to help patients change their habits, it is essential to identify the most effective approach. Many efforts have been devoted to explain changes in or adherence to specific health behaviors. Such efforts have resulted in the development of theories that have been applied in prevention campaigns, and that include brief advice and counseling services. Within this context, Motivational Interviewing has proven to be effective in changing health behaviors in specific cases. However, more robust evidence is needed on the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in treating chronic pathologies -such as dyslipidemia- in patients assisted by general practitioners. This article describes a protocol to assess the effectiveness of MI as compared with general practice (brief advice), with the aim of improving lipid level control in patients with dyslipidemia assisted by a general practitioner. METHODS/

designAn open, two-arm parallel, multicentre, cluster, controlled, randomized, clinical trial will be performed. A total of 48-50 general practitioners from 35 public primary care centers in Spain will be randomized and will recruit 436 patients with dyslipidemia. They will perform an intervention based either on Motivational Interviewing or on the usual brief advice. After an initial assessment, follow-ups will be performed at 2, 4, 8 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are lipid levels (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides) and cardiovascular risk. The study will assess the degree of dietary and physical activity improvement, weight loss in overweight patients, and adherence to treatment guidelines. DISCUSSION: Motivational interview skills constitute the primary strategies GPs use to treat their patients. Having economical, simple, effective and applicable techniques is essential for primary care professionals to help their patients change their lifestyle and improve their health. This study will provide scientific evidence on the effectiveness of Motivational interviewing, and will be performed under strict control over the data collected, ensuring the maintenance of therapeutic integrity. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01282190).

Indexed as

General PracticeMotivationAdultAgedCholesterolDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHypolipidemic AgentsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTriglyceridesCholesterolHypolipidemic AgentsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID22054017
PMCPMC3238296
OpenAlexW2168900534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.