Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22053936›Full record

ReviewChemical research in toxicology2012

Application of the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant--target interactions.

Richard M Lopachin, Terrence Gavin, Anthony Decaprio, David S Barber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. A comparative study on the interaction of MJournal of molecular modeling · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard M LopachinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center , 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States. lopachin@einstein.yu.edu
Terrence Gavin
Anthony Decaprio
David S Barber
Florida International University · USIona College · USMontefiore Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

The Nerve Terminal as the Site of Action for Type-2 AlkenesR01ES003830 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LOPACHIN, RICHARD MICHAEL · 1986 to 2015
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES003830NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES03830-24PHS HHS NIEHS RO1 07912-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many chemical toxicants and/or their active metabolites are electrophiles that cause cell injury by forming covalent bonds with nucleophilic targets on biological macromolecules. Covalent reactions between nucleophilic and electrophilic reagents are, however, discriminatory since there is a significant degree of selectivity associated with these interactions. Over the course of the past few decades, the theory of Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) has proven to be a useful tool in predicting the outcome of such reactions. This concept utilizes the inherent electronic characteristic of polarizability to define, for example, reacting electrophiles and nucleophiles as either hard or soft. These HSAB definitions have been successfully applied to chemical-induced toxicity in biological systems. Thus, according to this principle, a toxic electrophile reacts preferentially with biological targets of similar hardness or softness. The soft/hard classification of a xenobiotic electrophile has obvious utility in discerning plausible biological targets and molecular mechanisms of toxicity. The purpose of this perspective is to discuss the HSAB theory of electrophiles and nucleophiles within a toxicological framework. In principle, covalent bond formation can be described by using the properties of their outermost or frontier orbitals. Because these orbital energies for most chemicals can be calculated using quantum mechanical models, it is possible to quantify the relative softness (σ) or hardness (η) of electrophiles or nucleophiles and to subsequently convert this information into useful indices of reactivity. This atomic level information can provide insight into the design of corroborative laboratory research and thereby help investigators discern corresponding molecular sites and mechanisms of toxicant action. The use of HSAB parameters has also been instrumental in the development and identification of potential nucleophilic cytoprotectants that can scavenge toxic electrophiles. Clearly, the difficult task of delineating molecular sites and mechanisms of toxicant action can be facilitated by the application of this quantitative approach.

Indexed as

AcidsAlkaliesAnimalsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, ChemicalQuantum TheoryXenobioticsAcidsAlkaliesXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID22053936
PMCPMC3288258
OpenAlexW2059726151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.