ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2012
Application of biomarkers to clinical trials in systemic sclerosis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum lysyl oxidase concentration increases in long-standing systemic sclerosis: Can lysyl oxidase change over time?Archives of rheumatology · 2022Article
- The ST2/IL-33 Axis in Immune Cells during Inflammatory Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Prediction of improvement in skin fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR analysis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2016Article
- Biomarkers in Scleroderma: Progressing from Association to Clinical Utility.Current rheumatology reports · 2016Review
- Update on biomarkers in systemic sclerosis: tools for diagnosis and treatment.Seminars in immunopathology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Important clinical advances in the treatment of systemic sclerosis have been made, yet fibrotic disease remains largely untreatable. Optimal design of clinical trials to test new therapeutics for fibrotic disease features has suffered from dual difficulties in patient selection and patient evaluation. Patient selection for entry into trials for treatment of interstitial lung disease and/or skin fibrosis is challenged by the natural history of the disease, which stabilizes in some patients while relentlessly progressing in others, and our lack of good clinical markers to distinguish between these trajectories. Patient evaluation is made difficult, particularly in skin disease, by the inherent difficulty in quantifying the extent of disease. Biomarkers hold the potential to solve many of these problems as surrogate outcome measures and as markers for disease progression. Identified biomarkers may have the potential to graduate to surrogate outcome singly or, more likely, in combination. Predictive biomarkers are still largely unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.