Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2011
Effects of an eHealth literacy intervention for older adults.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 99 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development and Implementation of eHealth Literacy Workshops in the Community
Improving eHealth Literacy of Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of eHealth literacy interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for improving health literacy among older people: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Modifiable predictors of health literacy in working-age adults - a rapid review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Design of an Integrated Acceptance Framework for Older Users and eHealth: Influential Factor Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Measurement of Digital Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Health Literacy in Web-Based Health Information Environments: Systematic Review of Concepts, Definitions, and Operationalization for Measurement.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Conditions for the Successful Integration of an eHealth Tool "StopBlues" Into Community-Based Interventions in France: Results From a Multiple Correspondence Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Digital literacy linked to engagement and psychological benefits among breast cancer survivors in Internet-based peer support groups.European journal of cancer care · 2019Trial
- Remote Usability Testing and Satisfaction with a Mobile Health Medication Inquiry System in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015Trial
- Demographic and clinical characteristics of middle-aged versus younger adults enrolled in a clinical trial of a web-delivered psychosocial treatment for substance use disorders.Journal of addiction medicineTrial
- AI Chatbots vs. Traditional Sources: Dental Health Literacy and Confidence Among Dental Patients-A Cross-Sectional Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Preferences for Personalized Text Message Appointment Reminders Among Outpatients in a Universal Health System: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- How smart companions reshape psychological well-being in later life: the role of artificial intelligence technology in mental health during senior years.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- eHealth Literacy Interventions: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults generally have low health and computer literacies, making it challenging for them to function well in the eHealth era where technology is increasingly being used in health care. Little is known about effective interventions and strategies for improving the eHealth literacy of the older population.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the effects of a theory-driven eHealth literacy intervention for older adults.
methodsThe experimental design was a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design with learning method (collaborative; individualistic) as the between-participants variable and time of measurement (pre; post) as the within-participants variable. A total of 146 older adults aged 56-91 (mean 69.99, SD 8.12) participated in this study during February to May 2011. The intervention involved 2 weeks of learning about using the National Institutes of Health's SeniorHealth.gov website to access reliable health information. The intervention took place at public libraries. Participants were randomly assigned to either experimental condition (collaborative: n = 72; individualistic: n = 74).
resultsOverall, participants' knowledge, skills, and eHealth literacy efficacy all improved significantly from pre to post intervention (P < .001 in all cases; effect sizes were >0.8 with statistical power of 1.00 even at the .01 level in all cases). When controlling for baseline differences, no significant main effect of the learning method was found on computer/Web knowledge, skills, or eHealth literacy efficacy. Thus, collaborative learning did not differ from individualistic learning in affecting the learning outcomes. No significant interaction effect of learning method and time of measurement was found. Group composition based on gender, familiarity with peers, or prior computer experience had no significant main or interaction effect on the learning outcomes. Regardless of the specific learning method used, participants had overwhelmingly positive attitudes toward the intervention and reported positive changes in participation in their own health care as a result of the intervention.
conclusionsThe findings provide strong evidence that the eHealth literacy intervention tested in this study, regardless of the specific learning method used, significantly improved knowledge, skills, and eHealth literacy efficacy from pre to post intervention, was positively perceived by participants, and led to positive changes in their own health care. Collaborative learning did not differ from individualistic learning in affecting the learning outcomes, suggesting the previously widely reported advantages of collaborative over individualistic learning may not be easily applied to the older population in informal settings, though several confounding factors might have contributed to this finding (ie, the largely inexperienced computer user composition of the study sample, potential instructor effect, and ceiling effect). Further research is necessary before a more firm conclusion can be drawn. These findings contribute to the literatures on adult learning, social interdependence theory, and health literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.