Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22051674›Full record

ReviewNature2011

Subsurface water and clay mineral formation during the early history of Mars.

Bethany L Ehlmann, John F Mustard, Scott L Murchie, Jean-Pierre Bibring, Alain Meunier, Abigail A Fraeman, Yves Langevin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Organic matter and biomarkers: Why are samples required?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Water and other volatiles on Mars.National science review · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cells as the first data scientists.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bethany L EhlmannInstitut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, Université de Paris-Sud XI, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. ehlmann@caltech.edu
John F Mustard
Scott L Murchie
Jean-Pierre Bibring
Alain Meunier
Abigail A Fraeman
Yves Langevin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clay minerals, recently discovered to be widespread in Mars's Noachian terrains, indicate long-duration interaction between water and rock over 3.7 billion years ago. Analysis of how they formed should indicate what environmental conditions prevailed on early Mars. If clays formed near the surface by weathering, as is common on Earth, their presence would indicate past surface conditions warmer and wetter than at present. However, available data instead indicate substantial Martian clay formation by hydrothermal groundwater circulation and a Noachian rock record dominated by evidence of subsurface waters. Cold, arid conditions with only transient surface water may have characterized Mars's surface for over 4 billion years, since the early-Noachian period, and the longest-duration aqueous, potentially habitable environments may have been in the subsurface.

Indexed as

MarsAluminum SilicatesClayExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentGroundwaterIceSilicatesAluminum SilicatesbasaltClayIceSilicates

Identifiers

PMID22051674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.