ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research2010
Comparing the effects of Yasmin® and LD (low-dose estrogen) as contraceptive methods on menstrual cycle changes in women referred to the health care centers of Isfahan.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endometriosis and pain in the adolescent- striking early to limit suffering: A narrative review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- Effectiveness of presence of physician and midwife in quantity and quality of family planning services in health care centers.Journal of family & community medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the biggest problem today that most developing countries are faced with is the uncontrolled population growth; a serious threat to the international community. One of the most accessible contraceptive methods is the hormonal methods in which low-dose estrogen (LD) combined pills are considered as the most common among them. The most important reason for discontinuation of the combination pills is the side effects and following the discontinuation, it can lead to unwanted pregnancy. Promotion of more new methods and providing better methods with lesser side effects can be an important step towards solving some of the problems and increasing the usage percentages of contraceptive methods. This study therefore aimed to compare the effects of Yasmin and LD on menstrual cycle changes.
methodsIn this clinical trial study, 60 women referred to the Family Planning Health Center of Isfahan in 2008 were studied that finally after the sample loss, 27 and 24 samples were placed in Yasmin and LD groups, respectively. A questionnaire was used in order to collect the data. Content validity test and re-test also were used to confirm the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. To analyze the data, SPSS software and descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used.
resultsThe results of this study indicated that the bleeding rate in the Yasmin group within the next six month compared to taking them before was significantly lower than that in LD group (p = 0.02); but there was no significant difference in terms of menstrual bleeding duration and the two menstruation interval between the two groups (p = 0.2). There was no significant difference between the Yasmin and LD groups in terms of delay in menstruation and dysmenorrheal. Spotting rate significantly was higher in Yasmin group than that in LD group (p = 0.02). There was a significant reduction in terms of bleeding rate changes and menstrual bleeding duration in both Yasmin and LD group at the following next six months in comparison with before the consumption (p < 0.05).
conclusionsAccording to the results obtained, the oral combination of Yasmin pills has fewer side effects than LD pills. Therefore, it is recommended to start using Yasmin pill in the family planning units in Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22049290PMC3203286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.