ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research2010
The effects of supine and prone positions on oxygenation in premature infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03895242 (The Effect on Physiological Variables of Prone and Supine Positions Given to Preterm Infants Receiving Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect on Physiological Variables of Prone and Supine Positions Given to Preterm Infants Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Influence of body position on the displacement of nasal prongs in preterm newborns receiving continuous positive airway pressure].Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao PauloTrial
- Positional Change Used to Manage Postextubation Respiratory Failure in a Child With Cerebral Palsy.Anesthesia progress · 2023Article
- Comparison the effect of Sleep Positioning on Cardiorespiratory Rate in Noninvasive Ventilated Premature Infants.Nursing and midwifery studies · 2013Article
- The effect of open and closed endotracheal tube suctioning system on respiratory parameters of infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the use of high concentrations of oxygen in infants may lead to chronic lung problems, using proper methods of care in infants under mechanical ventilation is one of the most important measures in NICU. This study aimed to investigate the effects of prone and supine positions on oxygenation (SPO(2)) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation and comparing infants' oxygenation in the two positions.
methodsIn across over non randomized clinical trial study, 32 preterm infants under mechanical ventilation who had inclusion criteria were enrolled in simple convenient method. Firstly, they were placed in supine position for 120 minutes and further in prone position for 120 minutes .Their SPO(2) were monitored by pulse oximeter continuously and was recorded every minute. Data analysis was done using Software SPSS(15) by ANOVA test and post hoc test.
resultsThe data showed that during 120 minutes of exposure of infants in each position there were no significant changes in SPO(2). In addition, the SPO(2) levels in the prone position were significantly higher than the SPO(2) levels in the supine position from 15(th) minute to 120(th) minute (to the end).
conclusionsNeonatal positioning in prone position is a simple, non-invasive, and free of charge method that could lead to improve oxygenation in infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22049286PMC3203282W1557728655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.