Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22048121›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines2011

Advances and challenges towards a vaccine against Chagas disease.

Israel Quijano-Hernandez, Eric Dumonteil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fighting Strategies Against Chagas' Disease: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Chagas Disease: A Silent Threat for Dogs and Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. New insights intoFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Why do we still have not a vaccine against Chagas disease?Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nano-Medicines a Hope for Chagas Disease!Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Israel Quijano-HernandezLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales 'Dr. Hideyo Noguchi', Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico.
Eric Dumonteil

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease is major public health problem, affecting nearly 10 million people, characterized by cardiac alterations leading to congestive heart failure and death of 20-40% of the patients infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan parasite responsible for the disease. A vaccine would be key to improve disease control and we review here the recent advances and challenges of a T. cruzi vaccine. There is a growing consensus that a protective immune response requires the activation of a Th1 immune profile, with the stimulation of CD8 (+) T cells. Several vacines types, including recombinant proteins, DNA and viral vectors, as well as heterologous prime-boost combinations, have been found immunogenic and protective in mouse models, providing proof-of-concept data on the feasibility of a preventive or therapeutic vaccine to control a T. cruzi infection. However, several challenges such as better end-points, safety issues and trial design need to be addressed for further vaccine development to proceed.

Indexed as

AnimalsChagas DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesTrypanosoma cruziVaccinationProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22048121
PMCPMC3323496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.