Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22047726›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatry research2011

Neural response to eye contact and paroxetine treatment in generalized social anxiety disorder.

Franklin R Schneier, Marc Pomplun, Melissa Sy, Joy Hirsch

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatry research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neurocircuitry of treatment in anxiety disorders.Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural Correlates of Self-referential Processing and Their Clinical Implications in Social Anxiety Disorder.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franklin R SchneierAnxiety Disorders Clinic, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: frs1@columbia.edu.
Marc PomplunDepartment of Computer Science at the University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Melissa SyProgram for Imaging and Cognitive Sciences, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Joy HirschProgram for Imaging and Cognitive Sciences, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Neural circuitry of submissive behavior and treatment response in social anxietyR21MH077976 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SCHNEIER, FRANKLIN R. · 2007 to 2008
$355k
NIMH NIH HHS MH077976NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH077976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) is characterized by excessive fears of scrutiny and negative evaluation, but neural circuitry related to scrutiny in GSAD has been little studied. In this study, 16 unmedicated adults with GSAD and 16 matched healthy comparison (HC) participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neural response to viewed images of faces simulating movement into eye contact versus away from eye contact. GSAD patients were then treated for 8 weeks with paroxetine, and 15 patients were re-imaged. At baseline, GSAD patients had elevated neural response to eye contact in parahippocampal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, posterior cingulate and middle occipital cortex. During paroxetine treatment, symptomatic improvement was associated with decreased neural response to eye contact in regions including inferior and middle frontal gyri, anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, precuneus and inferior parietal lobule. Both the magnitude of GSAD symptom reduction with paroxetine treatment and the baseline comparison of GSAD vs. HCs were associated with neural processing of eye contact in distributed networks that included regions involved in self-referential processing. These findings demonstrate that eye contact in GSAD engages neurocircuitry consistent with the heightened self-conscious emotional states known to characterize GSAD patients during scrutiny.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultAnalysis of VarianceAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBrainEye MovementsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenParoxetinePhobic DisordersPhotic StimulationAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationOxygenParoxetine

Identifiers

PMID22047726
PMCPMC3230304
OpenAlexW2126111149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.