Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
A CFTR potentiator in patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 967 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VX-770 in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis and the G551D Mutation
Cystic Fibrosis Related Bone Disease: the Role of CFTR
Personalized Therapy of Cystic Fibrosis: Set-up of Response Markers
Nutritional Impact of Ivacaftor Treatment in 4 Month to 2 Year Old Children With CF Gating Mutations
Symptom Based Performance of Airway Clearance Therapy After Starting Highly Effective CFTR Modulator Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis
Studying the Presence of CFRD Complications With Thoughtful Recruitment (SPeCTRuM)
Who cites it
967 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of CFTR Pathogenic Variants in Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor and lumacaftor-ivacaftor for treating cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Clinimetric properties of field exercise tests in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- Use of elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024Pooled it
- Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Prebiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis and F508del-gating and F508del-residual function genotypes: results from an open-label extension study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Trial
- Cystic Fibrosis Microbiome-directed Antibiotic Therapy Trial in Exacerbations Results Stratified (CFMATTERS): results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.The European respiratory journal · 2025Trial
- Ivacaftor for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in a Phase 2 trial in adults with cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2025Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis and at least oneThe European respiratory journal · 2023Trial
- Icenticaftor, a CFTR Potentiator, in COPD: A Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Trial
- Adverse events during cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy in children with cystic fibrosis: an observational study.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Long-term effectiveness and safety of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators and their impact on the lives of people with cystic fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Protein rheostasis: quality control in metastable proteomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Operationalizing Precision Medicine in Drug Development: Predictive Biomarkers, Companion Diagnostics, and Regulatory Pathways.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Tutorial: interrogating biology using organoid technologies.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Beyond Tuberculosis: Late Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis in an Adolescent with Bronchiectasis and RecurrentDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thermophysiological and perceptual responses to exercise heat stress in people with cystic fibrosis on Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Article
907 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing the activity of defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein is a potential treatment for cystic fibrosis.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate ivacaftor (VX-770), a CFTR potentiator, in subjects 12 years of age or older with cystic fibrosis and at least one G551D-CFTR mutation. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of ivacaftor every 12 hours (84 subjects, of whom 83 received at least one dose) or placebo (83, of whom 78 received at least one dose) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the estimated mean change from baseline through week 24 in the percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)).
resultsThe change from baseline through week 24 in the percent of predicted FEV(1) was greater by 10.6 percentage points in the ivacaftor group than in the placebo group (P<0.001). Effects on pulmonary function were noted by 2 weeks, and a significant treatment effect was maintained through week 48. Subjects receiving ivacaftor were 55% less likely to have a pulmonary exacerbation than were patients receiving placebo, through week 48 (P<0.001). In addition, through week 48, subjects in the ivacaftor group scored 8.6 points higher than did subjects in the placebo group on the respiratory-symptoms domain of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-revised instrument (a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating a lower effect of symptoms on the patient's quality of life) (P<0.001). By 48 weeks, patients treated with ivacaftor had gained, on average, 2.7 kg more weight than had patients receiving placebo (P<0.001). The change from baseline through week 48 in the concentration of sweat chloride, a measure of CFTR activity, with ivacaftor as compared with placebo was -48.1 mmol per liter (P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar with ivacaftor and placebo, with a lower proportion of serious adverse events with ivacaftor than with placebo (24% vs. 42%).
conclusionsIvacaftor was associated with improvements in lung function at 2 weeks that were sustained through 48 weeks. Substantial improvements were also observed in the risk of pulmonary exacerbations, patient-reported respiratory symptoms, weight, and concentration of sweat chloride. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and others; VX08-770-102 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00909532.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.