Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22047194›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2011

Prospective memory deficits in Ecstasy users: effects of longer ongoing task delay interval.

Michael Weinborn, Steven Paul Woods, Claire Nulsen, Katherine Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prospective memory in substance abusers at treatment entry: associations with education, neuropsychological functioning, and everyday memory lapses.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael WeinbornSchool of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. michael.weinborn@uwa.edu.au
Steven Paul Woods
Claire Nulsen
Katherine Park

Funding

Prospective Memory in HIV-1 InfectionR01MH073419 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WOODS, STEVEN PAUL · 2005 to 2017
$6.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073419NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH73419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecstasy use has been associated with neurotoxicity and neurocognitive impairment in a variety of domains, including prospective memory (ProM), which involves the delayed execution of a previously encoded intention in response to a specific cue. The present study adopted the multiprocess theory of ProM to evaluate the hypothesis that Ecstasy users would evidence differentially impaired ProM on longer versus shorter ongoing task delays. Ecstasy (n = 31) users, high-risk alcohol users (n = 21), and healthy nonusers (n = 31) completed the short (2-min) and long (15-min) delay ProM scales of the Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Results showed a significant group by ProM delay interaction, such that Ecstasy users performed comparably to the comparison groups on short-delay trials, but were impaired on long-delay ProM, particularly for time-based cues. Among the Ecstasy users, long-delay ProM was positively associated with risky decision making, but not with retrospective memory or other aspects of executive functions. These findings suggest that Ecstasy users may be particularly susceptible to deficits in strategic target monitoring and maintenance of cue-intention pairings over longer ProM delays. Findings are discussed in the context of their potential everyday functioning (e.g., academic, vocational) and treatment implications for Ecstasy users.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultAlcoholsAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersNeuropsychological TestsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSubstance-Related DisordersTime FactorsYoung AdultAlcoholsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID22047194
PMCPMC3229681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.