Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22047024›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2011

Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Anna Moschny, Petra Platen, Renate Klaassen-Mielke, Ulrike Trampisch, Timo Hinrichs

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03394495 (Evaluation of an Individualized Exercise Programme Plus Behavioural Change Enhancement Strategies for Managing General Fatigue in Community-dwelling Frail Older People), which is not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03394495 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of an Individualized Exercise Programme Plus Behavioural Change Enhancement Strategies for Managing General Fatigue in Community-dwelling Frail Older People: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled184ConditionsFatigueArmsBCE Combination group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Effects of Elastic Band Exercise on Functional Fitness and Blood Pressure Response in the Healthy Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Effects of Small-Sided Recreational Volleyball on Health Markers and Physical Fitness in Middle-Aged Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna MoschnyDepartment of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, University of Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany. anna.moschny@rub.de
Petra Platen
Renate Klaassen-Mielke
Ulrike Trampisch
Timo Hinrichs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse barriers to physical activity in a cohort of older adults, allowing comparisons between men and women, and age groups.

methods1,937 older adults with a median age of 77 (range 72-93) years (53.3% female) took part in the 7-year follow-up telephone interviews of the getABI cohort. Participants who stated that they did not get enough physical activity were surveyed with respect to barriers to physical activity. Barriers were analysed for all respondents, as well as by sex and age group for cases with complete data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate differences between sexes and age groups. The level of significance (alpha < 0.05) was adjusted for multiple testing according to Bonferroni (p < .004).

results1,607 (83.0%) participants stated that they were sufficiently physically active. 286 participants rated their physical activity as insufficient and responded to questions on barriers to physical activity completely. The three most frequently cited barriers were poor health (57.7%), lack of company (43.0%), and lack of interest (36.7%). Lack of opportunities for sports or leisure activities (30.3% vs. 15.6%), and lack of transport (29.0% vs. 7.1%) were more frequently stated by female respondents than male respondents. These differences between men and women were significant (p = .003; p < .001) after adjustment for respondents' age. Analyses by age groups revealed that poor health was more frequently considered a barrier to physical activity by participants aged 80+ years compared to the younger age group (71.1% vs. 51.5%). This age-dependent difference was significant (p = .002) irrespective of the participants' sex.

conclusionsThe present study provides relevant data on barriers to physical activity in older adults. By revealing appreciable differences between men and women, and age groups, this study has implications for efforts to increase older adults' physical activity. Promotion and intervention strategies should consider the barriers and tailor measures to the specific needs of older adults in order to reduce their constraints to physical activity.

Indexed as

ExerciseAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHealth PromotionHealth StatusHumansMaleMotivationPainProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22047024
PMCPMC3225299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.