Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22046351›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Nebulisation of receptor-targeted nanocomplexes for gene delivery to the airway epithelium.

Maria D I Manunta, Robin J McAnulty, Aristides D Tagalakis, Stephen E Bottoms, Frederick Campbell, Helen C Hailes, Alethea B Tabor, Geoffrey J Laurent, Christopher O'Callaghan, Stephen L Hart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research Progress on Liposome Pulmonary Delivery ofJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Airway deposition of nebulized gene delivery nanocomplexes monitored by radioimaging agents.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria D I ManuntaWolfson Centre for Gene Therapy of Childhood Disease, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Robin J McAnulty
Aristides D Tagalakis
Stephen E Bottoms
Frederick Campbell
Helen C Hailes
Alethea B Tabor
Geoffrey J Laurent
Christopher O'Callaghan
Stephen L Hart
University College London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene therapy mediated by synthetic vectors may provide opportunities for new treatments for cystic fibrosis (CF) via aerosolisation. Vectors for CF must transfect the airway epithelium efficiently and not cause inflammation so they are suitable for repeated dosing. The inhaled aerosol should be deposited in the airways since the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) is expressed predominantly in the epithelium of the submucosal glands and in the surface airway epithelium. The aim of this project was to develop an optimised aerosol delivery approach applicable to treatment of CF lung disease by gene therapy. METHODOLOGY: The vector suspension investigated in this study comprises receptor-targeting peptides, cationic liposomes and plasmid DNA that self-assemble by electrostatic interactions to form a receptor-targeted nanocomplex (RTN) of approximately 150 nm with a cationic surface charge of +50 mV. The aerodynamic properties of aerosolised nanocomplexes produced with three different nebulisers were compared by determining aerosol deposition in the different stages of a Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI). We also investigated the yield of intact plasmid DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis and densitometry, and transfection efficacies in vitro and in vivo.

resultsRTNs nebulised with the AeroEclipse II BAN were the most effective, compared to other nebulisers tested, for gene delivery both in vitro and in vivo. The biophysical properties of the nanocomplexes were unchanged after nebulisation while the deposition of RTNs suggested a range of aerosol aerodynamic sizes between 5.5 µm-1.4 µm cut off (NGI stages 3-6) compatible with deposition in the central and lower airways.

conclusionsRTNs showed their ability at delivering genes via nebulisation, thus suggesting their potential applications for therapeutic interventions of cystic fibrosis and other respiratory disorders.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesNebulizers and VaporizersCystic FibrosisEpitheliumGenetic TherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyNanocompositesPlasmidsRespiratory MucosaTransfection

Identifiers

PMID22046351
PMCPMC3202583
OpenAlexW2161519046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.