Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22046143›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

A conserved developmental patterning network produces quantitatively different output in multiple species of Drosophila.

Charless C Fowlkes, Kelly B Eckenrode, Meghan D Bragdon, Miriah Meyer, Zeba Wunderlich, Lisa Simirenko, Cris L Luengo Hendriks, Soile V E Keränen, Clara Henriquez, David W Knowles and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of larval segment position across 12 Drosophila species.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Reply to Jiang and Zhang: Parallel transcriptomic signature of monogamy: What is the null hypothesis anyway?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shadow enhancers enable Hunchback bifunctionality in the Drosophila embryo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Charless C FowlkesDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Kelly B Eckenrode
Meghan D Bragdon
Miriah Meyer
Zeba Wunderlich
Lisa Simirenko
Cris L Luengo Hendriks
Soile V E Keränen
Clara Henriquez
David W Knowles
Mark D Biggin
Michael B Eisen
Angela H DePace
Harvard University · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USQB3 · USSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Transcription Network Controlling Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM070444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BIGGIN, MARK D · 2003 to 2007
$14.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM704403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the level, timing, or location of gene expression can contribute to alternative phenotypes at the molecular and organismal level. Understanding the origins of expression differences is complicated by the fact that organismal morphology and gene regulatory networks could potentially vary even between closely related species. To assess the scope of such changes, we used high-resolution imaging methods to measure mRNA expression in blastoderm embryos of Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila pseudoobscura and assembled these data into cellular resolution atlases, where expression levels for 13 genes in the segmentation network are averaged into species-specific, cellular resolution morphological frameworks. We demonstrate that the blastoderm embryos of these species differ in their morphology in terms of size, shape, and number of nuclei. We present an approach to compare cellular gene expression patterns between species, while accounting for varying embryo morphology, and apply it to our data and an equivalent dataset for Drosophila melanogaster. Our analysis reveals that all individual genes differ quantitatively in their spatio-temporal expression patterns between these species, primarily in terms of their relative position and dynamics. Despite many small quantitative differences, cellular gene expression profiles for the whole set of genes examined are largely similar. This suggests that cell types at this stage of development are conserved, though they can differ in their relative position by up to 3-4 cell widths and in their relative proportion between species by as much as 5-fold. Quantitative differences in the dynamics and relative level of a subset of genes between corresponding cell types may reflect altered regulatory functions between species. Our results emphasize that transcriptional networks can diverge over short evolutionary timescales and that even small changes can lead to distinct output in terms of the placement and number of equivalent cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBlastodermBody PatterningDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSpecies SpecificityDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22046143
PMCPMC3203197
OpenAlexW2010888961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.