Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22046025›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2011

Identification and elucidation of the biology of adverse events: the challenges of safety assessment and translational medicine.

Kenneth W Turteltaub, Myrtle A Davis, Leigh Ann Burns-Naas, Michael P Lawton, Adam M Clark, Jack A Reynolds

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Adaptive clinical trial designs for simultaneous testing of matched diagnostics and therapeutics.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth W TurteltaubBattelle Memorial Institute and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Biosciences and Biotechnology Division Center for Accelerator, Livermore, California 94550, USA. turteltaub2@llnl.gov
Myrtle A Davis
Leigh Ann Burns-Naas
Michael P Lawton
Adam M Clark
Jack A Reynolds

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an explosion of technology-enabled scientific insight into the basic biology of the causes of adverse events. This has been driven, in part, by the development of the various "omics" tools (e.g., genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) and associated bioinformatics platforms. Meanwhile, for decades, changes in preclinical testing protocols and guidelines have been limited. Preclinical safety testing currently relies heavily on the use of outdated animal models. Application of systems biology methods to evaluation of toxicities in oncology treatments can accelerate the introduction of safe, effective drugs. Systems biology adds insights regarding the causes and mechanisms of adverse effects, provides important and actionable information to help understand the risks and benefits to humans, focuses testing on methods that add value to the safety testing process, and leads to modifications of chemical entities to reduce liabilities during development. Leveraging emerging technologies, such as genomics and proteomics, may make preclinical safety testing more efficient and accurate and lead to better safety decisions. The development of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance document on the use of systems biology in clinical testing would greatly benefit the development of drugs for oncology by communicating the potential application of specific methodologies, providing a framework for qualification and application of systems biology outcomes, and providing insight into the challenges and limitations of systems biology in the regulatory decision-making process.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansSystems BiologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.