Trial reportSurgery today2012
Digital evaluation of the muscle functions of the lower extremities among inguinal hernia patients treated using three different surgical techniques: a prospective randomized study.
Trial report in Surgery today, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of endoscopic surgery and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: A network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Guideline
- EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Guideline
- Quantitative assessment of the impacts of stoppa repair and total extraperitoneal repair on the lower extremity muscular functions in cases of unilateral inguinal hernia: a randomized controlled study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017Trial
- Subcutaneous fat thickness predicts postoperative seroma following laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal hernioplasty.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- A novel laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair technique: single-port lateral non-abdominal pre-peritoneal approach.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Safety of two common laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy approaches: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair: comparison of the Prolene Hernia System and the Mesh Plug method.Surgery today · 2014Article
- Laparoscopic trans-peritoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) is useful for obturator hernias: report of a case.Surgery today · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAn inguinal hernia is a common pathology that can be treated using several different surgical procedures. Although there have been many studies comparing the clinical results of these techniques, there has so far been no digital analysis of the alterations developing secondary to pain with regard to the muscle functions of the lower extremities. This prospective randomized trial was designed to compare this aspect for subjects treated using the laparoscopic techniques and those treated using the conventional method.
methodsA total of 75 patients, 25 of whom who had undergone hernia repair using the total extraperitoneal technique, 25 of whom who had undergone repair using the transabdominal preperitoneal technique, and 25 who had undergone repair using the Prolene mesh graft technique, were evaluated preoperatively and on the third postoperative day by isometric and isokinetic measurements, the visual analog score (VAS), the necessity of postoperative analgesia, complications, and the time that had elapsed before returning to work, and these results were recorded.
resultsHernia repair using the conventional method led to an average of 3 times more muscle function loss compared with the laparoscopic techniques, and this difference was shown to be statistically significant. The VAS, postoperative complications, and time elapsed before returning to work were lower for laparoscopic surgeries and also were compatible with the findings described in the previous literature.
conclusionsUse of a digital environment with numerical parameters and measurements recorded using a dynamometer demonstrated that in the early postoperative period and on the third postoperative day, open surgery causes more functional loss in the lower extremities than laparoscopic methods. Therefore, surgeons should use laparoscopic methods whenever possible to reduce both pain and loss of muscle function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22045231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.