Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22045217›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2012

A contemporary review of seafood allergy.

Parvaneh Hajeb, Jinap Selamat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  9. The challenge of treating orphan disease.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The changing geoepidemiology of food allergies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  13. Food allergy: diagnosis, management & emerging therapies.The Indian journal of medical research · 2014
    Review
  14. Fish allergy: in review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cutting-edge issues in autoimmunity and allergy of the digestive system.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parvaneh HajebCenter of Excellence for Food Safety Research (CEFSR), Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jinap Selamat

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seafood is common item in the world diet; Asian countries have the highest rates of fish consumption in the world, which is higher than world average. Several studies have been conducted on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of seafood allergy in different countries, and some of the fish and seafood allergens unique to those regions have been characterized. Review on published data showed that seafood allergy is very ubiquitous in some regions of the world. Fish and shellfish are the most common seafood that cause adverse allergic reactions among nations; the symptoms ranged from oral allergy syndromes to urticaria and anaphylaxis. The major identified allergens are parvalbumin in fish and tropomyosin in shellfish. Nevertheless, such studies are lacking from some regions with high fish and seafood consumption. Furthermore, the published data are mostly from small groups of populations, which large-scale epidemiological studies need to be performed.

Indexed as

AfricaAllergensAnimalsAsiaCrustaceaEuropeFishesFood HypersensitivityHumansMolluscaPrevalenceSeafoodUnited StatesAllergens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.